1998 Rover 214 — MOT failures & pass rate

The 1998 Rover 214 passed 72.4% of its 859 recorded MOT tests. Against all cars of a similar age (25.7% fail rate), the 1998 214 comes out 1.9pp worse. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, brakes and emissions & environmental.

72%
Pass rate
859
MOT tests analysed
27.6%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
24.6
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (13.0%) and brakes (10.5%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are catalyst emissions, service brake performance and component mounting prescribed areas — catalyst emissions alone was recorded 97 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 14.1% of 0-30k cars fail, rising to 30.8% once past 120-150k — 2.2× the risk.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 27.1% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 1998 214 27.6% cars avg 23.1% National avg 25.7%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 1998 Rover 214
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 13.0% 112
2 Brakes 10.5% 90
3 Emissions & environmental 9.4% 81
4 Suspension 7.8% 67
5 Body, structure & corrosion 7.0% 60
6 Visibility 6.3% 54
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 13.0% Brakes 10.5% Emissions & environmental 9.4% Suspension 7.8% Body, structure & corrosion 7.0% Visibility 6.3%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 1998 Rover 214
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Catalyst emissions97
2Service brake performance68
3Component mounting prescribed areas67
4Wipers43
5Stop lamp39
6Prescribed areas33

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 1998 Rover 214
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 27.1% 233
2 Suspension 26.4% 227
3 Tyres 26.0% 223
4 Emissions & environmental 21.3% 183
5 Body, structure & corrosion 20.4% 175
6 Other defects 19.2% 165

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 14.1% 30-60k 27.7% 60-90k 30.2% 90-120k 29.8% 120-150k 30.8%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 1998 214
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 85 14.1%
30-60k 325 27.7%
60-90k 268 30.2%
90-120k 124 29.8%
120-150k 52 30.8%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 23 yrs 26.1% 24 yrs 28.5% 25 yrs 29.3%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 1998 214
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 253 26.1%
2022 200 28.5%
2023 174 29.3%
2024 128 28.1%
2025 104 26.0%

What to check before buying a 1998 214

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 13.0% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 1998 Rover 214s pass their MOT?

72.4% of the 859 1998 Rover 214 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 27.6% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 1998 Rover 214?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 13.0% of tests, followed by brakes (10.5%).

Does the 1998 214 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 14.1% in the 0-30k band to 30.8% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 859 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data