1995 Rover 214 — MOT failures & pass rate

767 MOT tests on the 1995 Rover 214 are in this dataset, and 73.9% of them passed. That is 1.8 percentage points worse than all cars of a similar age, which fail at 24.3%. Failures cluster in emissions & environmental, lighting & signalling and suspension.

74%
Pass rate
767
MOT tests analysed
26.1%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
27.7
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Emissions & environmental dominates the failure mix at 14.1% of all tests — 5.7 points clear of lighting & signalling, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are catalyst emissions, component mounting prescribed areas and wipers — catalyst emissions alone was recorded 172 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 6.7% in the 0-30k band and 38.7% in the 150k+ band, a 32.0-point spread — more than double.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: suspension was flagged on 25.2% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 24.4% of tests failed in 2021 against 26.1% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 1995 214 26.1% cars avg 22.6% National avg 24.3%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 1995 Rover 214
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Emissions & environmental 14.1% 108
2 Lighting & signalling 8.3% 64
3 Suspension 7.7% 59
4 Body, structure & corrosion 7.6% 58
5 Brakes 4.8% 37
6 Visibility 4.0% 31
Share of tests failing on each category Emissions & environmental 14.1% Lighting & signalling 8.3% Suspension 7.7% Body, structure & corrosion 7.6% Brakes 4.8% Visibility 4.0%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 1995 Rover 214
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Catalyst emissions172
2Component mounting prescribed areas69
3Wipers32
4Joints30
5Service brake performance29
6Prescribed areas26

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 1995 Rover 214
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 25.2% 193
2 Tyres 23.5% 180
3 Emissions & environmental 19.8% 152
4 Body, structure & corrosion 15.3% 117
5 Other defects 13.8% 106
6 Brakes 13.3% 102

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 6.7% 30-60k 18.4% 60-90k 26.2% 90-120k 36.0% 120-150k 32.7% 150k+ 38.7%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 1995 214
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 30 6.7%
30-60k 207 18.4%
60-90k 305 26.2%
90-120k 139 36.0%
120-150k 55 32.7%
150k+ 31 38.7%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 1995 214
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 197 24.4%
2022 186 28.0%
2023 140 27.1%
2024 129 24.8%
2025 115 26.1%

What to check before buying a 1995 214

On a 1995 214, emissions & environmental is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 14.1% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 1995 Rover 214s pass their MOT?

73.9% of the 767 1995 Rover 214 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 26.1% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 1995 Rover 214?

Emissions & environmental, recorded in 14.1% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (8.3%).

Does the 1995 214 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 6.7% in the 0-30k band to 38.7% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 767 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data