2016 Renault Master — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2016 Renault Master passed 84.5% of its 4,543 recorded MOT tests. Vans of a similar age fail 19.6% of the time, so this is 4.1pp better than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, brakes and visibility.

85%
Pass rate
4,543
MOT tests analysed
15.5%
Fail rate
better than
vs vans of similar age
7
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: lighting & signalling, recorded in 12.3% of tests against 6.0% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp aim, position lamp and headlamp — headlamp aim alone was recorded 213 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 8.2% in the 0-30k band and 17.8% in the 150k+ band, a 9.6-point spread — more than double.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 17.7% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 13.8% of tests failed in 2021 against 16.3% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2016 Master 15.5% vans avg 19.6% National avg 14.5%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2016 Renault Master
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 12.3% 561
2 Brakes 6.0% 274
3 Visibility 4.0% 183
4 Suspension 3.4% 156
5 Tyres 2.8% 127
6 Body, structure & corrosion 2.8% 126
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 12.3% Brakes 6.0% Visibility 4.0% Suspension 3.4% Tyres 2.8% Body, structure & corrosion 2.8%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2016 Renault Master
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp aim213
2Position lamp192
3Headlamp111
4Brake pads99
5Outline marker lamp94
6Wipers93

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2016 Renault Master
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 17.7% 806
2 Tyres 15.0% 680
3 Lighting & signalling 9.3% 421
4 Suspension 8.3% 378
5 Visibility 4.7% 214
6 Other defects 4.4% 198

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 8.2% 30-60k 14.3% 60-90k 17.3% 90-120k 15.9% 120-150k 17.3% 150k+ 17.8%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2016 Master
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 596 8.2%
30-60k 850 14.3%
60-90k 659 17.3%
90-120k 586 15.9%
120-150k 588 17.3%
150k+ 1,255 17.8%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 5 yrs 13.8% 6 yrs 15.3% 7 yrs 15.4% 8 yrs 16.7% 9 yrs 16.3%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2016 Master
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 877 13.8%
2022 931 15.3%
2023 918 15.4%
2024 919 16.7%
2025 898 16.3%

What to check before buying a 2016 Master

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 12.3% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2016 Renault Masters pass their MOT?

84.5% of the 4,543 2016 Renault Master MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 15.5% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2016 Renault Master?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 12.3% of tests, followed by brakes (6.0%).

Does the 2016 Master get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 8.2% in the 0-30k band to 17.8% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 4,543 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data