2004 Renault Master — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 4,075 MOT tests, the 2004 Renault Master recorded a 69.1% pass rate. Vans of a similar age fail at 29.9%, so the 2004 Master sits squarely on the average. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, brakes and suspension.

69%
Pass rate
4,075
MOT tests analysed
30.9%
Fail rate
in line with
vs vans of similar age
18.8
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (19.0%) and brakes (17.0%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are rbt (sp), position lamp and headlamp aim — rbt (sp) alone was recorded 414 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 22.2% of 0-30k cars fail, rising to 31.7% once past 150k.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 35.9% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2004 Master 30.9% vans avg 29.9% National avg 27.7%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2004 Renault Master
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 19.0% 773
2 Brakes 17.0% 694
3 Suspension 11.6% 474
4 Body, structure & corrosion 7.7% 312
5 Visibility 6.6% 269
6 Steering 5.5% 225
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 19.0% Brakes 17.0% Suspension 11.6% Body, structure & corrosion 7.7% Visibility 6.6% Steering 5.5%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2004 Renault Master
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Rbt (sp)414
2Position lamp257
3Headlamp aim243
4Service brake performance240
5Ball joint218
6Component mounting prescribed areas203

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2004 Renault Master
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 35.9% 1,465
2 Suspension 27.7% 1,129
3 Lighting & signalling 19.5% 794
4 Tyres 18.2% 742
5 Emissions & environmental 16.7% 680
6 Other defects 15.6% 635

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 22.2% 30-60k 24.7% 60-90k 25.1% 90-120k 30.9% 120-150k 35.3% 150k+ 31.7%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2004 Master
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 54 22.2%
30-60k 312 24.7%
60-90k 501 25.1%
90-120k 696 30.9%
120-150k 828 35.3%
150k+ 1,658 31.7%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 17 yrs 31.2% 18 yrs 30.3% 19 yrs 30.5% 20 yrs 31.4% 21 yrs 31.4%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2004 Master
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 930 31.2%
2022 889 30.3%
2023 822 30.5%
2024 761 31.4%
2025 673 31.4%

What to check before buying a 2004 Master

On a 2004 Master, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 19.0% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2004 Renault Masters pass their MOT?

69.1% of the 4,075 2004 Renault Master MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 30.9% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2004 Renault Master?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 19.0% of tests, followed by brakes (17.0%).

Does the 2004 Master get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 22.2% in the 0-30k band to 31.7% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 4,075 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data