2002 Renault Master — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2002 Renault Master passed 67.7% of its 2,710 recorded MOT tests. That is 2.4 percentage points worse than vans of a similar age, which fail at 29.9%. Failures cluster in brakes, lighting & signalling and suspension.

68%
Pass rate
2,710
MOT tests analysed
32.3%
Fail rate
worse than
vs vans of similar age
20.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Brakes dominates the failure mix at 20.4% of all tests — 3.0 points clear of lighting & signalling, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are rbt (sp), service brake performance and component mounting prescribed areas — rbt (sp) alone was recorded 307 times.

Mileage matters less than usual here: the 2002 Master fails 33.3% of the time in the 0-30k band and 34.4% at 150k+, a spread of only 1.0 points.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 40.1% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2002 Master 32.3% vans avg 29.9% National avg 27.4%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2002 Renault Master
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Brakes 20.4% 554
2 Lighting & signalling 17.4% 472
3 Suspension 12.2% 331
4 Body, structure & corrosion 8.8% 237
5 Visibility 7.8% 212
6 Steering 6.8% 185
Share of tests failing on each category Brakes 20.4% Lighting & signalling 17.4% Suspension 12.2% Body, structure & corrosion 8.8% Visibility 7.8% Steering 6.8%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2002 Renault Master
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Rbt (sp)307
2Service brake performance257
3Component mounting prescribed areas237
4Steering rack185
5Wipers158
6Position lamp147

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2002 Renault Master
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 40.1% 1,087
2 Suspension 29.9% 810
3 Tyres 18.9% 511
4 Lighting & signalling 18.4% 499
5 Emissions & environmental 17.7% 479
6 Other defects 15.5% 421

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 33.3% 30-60k 24.1% 60-90k 31.2% 90-120k 33.1% 120-150k 34.1% 150k+ 34.4%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2002 Master
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 54 33.3%
30-60k 311 24.1%
60-90k 491 31.2%
90-120k 543 33.1%
120-150k 586 34.1%
150k+ 719 34.4%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 19 yrs 32.3% 20 yrs 31.9% 21 yrs 32.6% 22 yrs 32.5% 23 yrs 32.3%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2002 Master
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 620 32.3%
2022 576 31.9%
2023 546 32.6%
2024 507 32.5%
2025 461 32.3%

What to check before buying a 2002 Master

On a 2002 Master, brakes is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 20.4% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2002 Renault Masters pass their MOT?

67.7% of the 2,710 2002 Renault Master MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 32.3% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2002 Renault Master?

Brakes, recorded in 20.4% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (17.4%).

Does the 2002 Master get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 33.3% in the 0-30k band to 34.4% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 2,710 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data