2009 Renault Grand Espace — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2009 Renault Grand Espace passed 69.0% of its 1,089 recorded MOT tests. Against all cars of a similar age (25.2% fail rate), the 2009 Grand Espace comes out 5.8pp worse. Failures cluster in suspension, lighting & signalling and brakes.

69%
Pass rate
1,089
MOT tests analysed
31.0%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
13.7
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — suspension (16.3%) and lighting & signalling (16.1%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are track rod end, coil spring and ball joint — track rod end alone was recorded 99 times.

Mileage matters less than usual here: the 2009 Grand Espace fails 28.6% of the time in the 30-60k band and 31.8% at 150k+, a spread of only 3.2 points.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 33.0% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2009 Grand Espace 31.0% cars avg 21.6% National avg 25.2%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2009 Renault Grand Espace
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 16.3% 177
2 Lighting & signalling 16.1% 175
3 Brakes 10.7% 117
4 Steering 8.3% 90
5 Tyres 6.5% 71
6 Visibility 5.8% 63
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 16.3% Lighting & signalling 16.1% Brakes 10.7% Steering 8.3% Tyres 6.5% Visibility 5.8%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2009 Renault Grand Espace
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Track rod end99
2Coil spring76
3Ball joint76
4Headlamp aim65
5Brake pads47
6Joints47

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2009 Renault Grand Espace
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 33.0% 359
2 Tyres 31.0% 338
3 Suspension 27.6% 301
4 Other defects 21.2% 231
5 Lighting & signalling 15.2% 165
6 Body, structure & corrosion 8.5% 93

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 28.6% 60-90k 29.9% 90-120k 32.2% 120-150k 29.8% 150k+ 31.8%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2009 Grand Espace
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 35 28.6%
60-90k 127 29.9%
90-120k 332 32.2%
120-150k 336 29.8%
150k+ 258 31.8%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 12 yrs 33.2% 13 yrs 28.1% 14 yrs 31.6% 15 yrs 29.0% 16 yrs 33.1%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2009 Grand Espace
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 280 33.2%
2022 242 28.1%
2023 228 31.6%
2024 176 29.0%
2025 163 33.1%

What to check before buying a 2009 Grand Espace

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: suspension accounted for 16.3% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2009 Renault Grand Espaces pass their MOT?

69.0% of the 1,089 2009 Renault Grand Espace MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 31.0% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2009 Renault Grand Espace?

Suspension, recorded in 16.3% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (16.1%).

Does the 2009 Grand Espace get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 28.6% in the 30-60k band to 31.8% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 1,089 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data