2006 Proton Savvy — MOT failures & pass rate

1,085 MOT tests on the 2006 Proton Savvy are in this dataset, and 64.8% of them passed. Against all cars of a similar age (27.2% fail rate), the 2006 Savvy comes out 8.1pp worse. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, brakes and suspension.

65%
Pass rate
1,085
MOT tests analysed
35.2%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
16.3
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Lighting & signalling dominates the failure mix at 22.0% of all tests — 3.3 points clear of brakes, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp aim, service brake performance and wipers — headlamp aim alone was recorded 197 times.

A 90-120k example is materially riskier than a 0-30k one: 42.6% versus 32.7%.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: suspension was flagged on 41.6% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2006 Savvy 35.2% cars avg 23.3% National avg 27.2%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2006 Proton Savvy
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 22.0% 239
2 Brakes 18.7% 203
3 Suspension 13.7% 149
4 Emissions & environmental 7.5% 81
5 Body, structure & corrosion 7.4% 80
6 Visibility 7.4% 80
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 22.0% Brakes 18.7% Suspension 13.7% Emissions & environmental 7.5% Body, structure & corrosion 7.4% Visibility 7.4%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2006 Proton Savvy
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp aim197
2Service brake performance124
3Wipers62
4Rigid brake pipes59
5Track rod end58
6Component mounting prescribed areas53

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2006 Proton Savvy
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 41.6% 451
2 Brakes 37.4% 406
3 Tyres 27.5% 298
4 Lighting & signalling 12.0% 130
5 Body, structure & corrosion 10.4% 113
6 Emissions & environmental 10.3% 112

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 32.7% 30-60k 33.5% 60-90k 35.8% 90-120k 42.6%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2006 Savvy
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 101 32.7%
30-60k 514 33.5%
60-90k 346 35.8%
90-120k 115 42.6%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 15 yrs 33.9% 16 yrs 35.0% 17 yrs 37.4% 18 yrs 36.3% 19 yrs 35.2%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2006 Savvy
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 378 33.9%
2022 283 35.0%
2023 198 37.4%
2024 135 36.3%
2025 91 35.2%

What to check before buying a 2006 Savvy

On a 2006 Savvy, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 22.0% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2006 Proton Savvys pass their MOT?

64.8% of the 1,085 2006 Proton Savvy MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 35.2% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2006 Proton Savvy?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 22.0% of tests, followed by brakes (18.7%).

Does the 2006 Savvy get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 32.7% in the 0-30k band to 42.6% in the 90-120k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 1,085 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data