2002 Perodua Kelisa — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2002 Perodua Kelisa passed 71.3% of its 282 recorded MOT tests. All cars of a similar age fail 27.5% of the time, so this is 1.2pp worse than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in body, structure & corrosion, lighting & signalling and visibility.

71%
Pass rate
282
MOT tests analysed
28.7%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
20.5
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Body, structure & corrosion dominates the failure mix at 13.5% of all tests — 5.0 points clear of lighting & signalling, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are wipers, tread depth and component mounting prescribed areas — wipers alone was recorded 25 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 20.7% in the 0-30k band and 28.3% in the 60-90k band, a 7.6-point spread.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: suspension was flagged on 31.9% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2002 Kelisa 28.7% cars avg 24.3% National avg 27.5%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2002 Perodua Kelisa
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Body, structure & corrosion 13.5% 38
2 Lighting & signalling 8.5% 24
3 Visibility 8.2% 23
4 Brakes 7.8% 22
5 Tyres 7.1% 20
6 Suspension 6.4% 18
Share of tests failing on each category Body, structure & corrosion 13.5% Lighting & signalling 8.5% Visibility 8.2% Brakes 7.8% Tyres 7.1% Suspension 6.4%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2002 Perodua Kelisa
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Wipers25
2Tread depth20
3Component mounting prescribed areas17
4Joints17
5Prescribed areas16
6Exhaust system16

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2002 Perodua Kelisa
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 31.9% 90
2 Tyres 30.1% 85
3 Body, structure & corrosion 26.6% 75
4 Brakes 25.2% 71
5 Lighting & signalling 17.0% 48
6 Other defects 13.8% 39

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 20.7% 30-60k 32.9% 60-90k 28.3%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2002 Kelisa
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 58 20.7%
30-60k 155 32.9%
60-90k 60 28.3%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 19 yrs 30.4% 20 yrs 22.8% 21 yrs 29.8% 22 yrs 30.8% 23 yrs 29.7%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2002 Kelisa
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 92 30.4%
2022 57 22.8%
2023 57 29.8%
2024 39 30.8%
2025 37 29.7%

What to check before buying a 2002 Kelisa

On a 2002 Kelisa, body, structure & corrosion is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 13.5% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2002 Perodua Kelisas pass their MOT?

71.3% of the 282 2002 Perodua Kelisa MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 28.7% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2002 Perodua Kelisa?

Body, structure & corrosion, recorded in 13.5% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (8.5%).

Does the 2002 Kelisa get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 20.7% in the 0-30k band to 28.3% in the 60-90k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 282 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data