2002 Nissan Primastar — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 325 MOT tests, the 2002 Nissan Primastar recorded a 64.0% pass rate. That is 6.0 percentage points worse than vans of a similar age, which fail at 29.9%. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and brakes.

64%
Pass rate
325
MOT tests analysed
36.0%
Fail rate
worse than
vs vans of similar age
20.6
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Lighting & signalling dominates the failure mix at 24.3% of all tests — 3.4 points clear of suspension, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp aim, ball joint and service brake performance — headlamp aim alone was recorded 38 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 38.9% in the 90-120k band and 32.3% in the 150k+ band, a 6.6-point spread.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 45.5% of tests without failing them.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 35.6% in 2021 to 33.3% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2002 Primastar 36.0% vans avg 29.9% National avg 27.5%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2002 Nissan Primastar
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 24.3% 79
2 Suspension 20.9% 68
3 Brakes 20.0% 65
4 Visibility 11.1% 36
5 Steering 10.2% 33
6 Body, structure & corrosion 7.4% 24
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 24.3% Suspension 20.9% Brakes 20.0% Visibility 11.1% Steering 10.2% Body, structure & corrosion 7.4%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2002 Nissan Primastar
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp aim38
2Ball joint37
3Service brake performance37
4Position lamp33
5Rbt (sp)31
6Track rod end31

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2002 Nissan Primastar
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 45.5% 148
2 Suspension 44.9% 146
3 Emissions & environmental 26.2% 85
4 Tyres 24.9% 81
5 Other defects 21.2% 69
6 Steering 15.7% 51

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 90-120k 38.9% 120-150k 38.9% 150k+ 32.3%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2002 Primastar
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
90-120k 72 38.9%
120-150k 90 38.9%
150k+ 130 32.3%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 19 yrs 35.6% 20 yrs 39.2% 21 yrs 36.1% 22 yrs 34.0% 23 yrs 33.3%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2002 Primastar
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 87 35.6%
2022 74 39.2%
2023 72 36.1%
2024 50 34.0%
2025 42 33.3%

What to check before buying a 2002 Primastar

On a 2002 Primastar, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 24.3% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2002 Nissan Primastars pass their MOT?

64.0% of the 325 2002 Nissan Primastar MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 36.0% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2002 Nissan Primastar?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 24.3% of tests, followed by suspension (20.9%).

Does the 2002 Primastar get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 38.9% in the 90-120k band to 32.3% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 325 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data