2008 Nissan Kubistar — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2008 Nissan Kubistar passed 70.1% of its 1,547 recorded MOT tests. All cars of a similar age fail 26.2% of the time, so this is 3.7pp worse than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, brakes and steering.

70%
Pass rate
1,547
MOT tests analysed
29.9%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
14.8
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Lighting & signalling dominates the failure mix at 18.6% of all tests — 6.3 points clear of brakes, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are position lamp, track rod end and steering rack — position lamp alone was recorded 124 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 30-60k one: 33.8% versus 25.2%.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 30.7% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2008 Kubistar 29.9% cars avg 22.4% National avg 26.2%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2008 Nissan Kubistar
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 18.6% 287
2 Brakes 12.2% 189
3 Steering 11.4% 177
4 Suspension 10.9% 168
5 Visibility 6.7% 103
6 Tyres 6.1% 94
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 18.6% Brakes 12.2% Steering 11.4% Suspension 10.9% Visibility 6.7% Tyres 6.1%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2008 Nissan Kubistar
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Position lamp124
2Track rod end101
3Steering rack93
4Headlamp aim85
5Registration plate lamp(s)77
6Service brake performance75

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2008 Nissan Kubistar
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 30.7% 475
2 Tyres 30.4% 470
3 Suspension 24.6% 380
4 Lighting & signalling 23.0% 356
5 Other defects 14.4% 223
6 Visibility 10.5% 163

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 25.2% 60-90k 27.7% 90-120k 28.7% 120-150k 31.8% 150k+ 33.8%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2008 Kubistar
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 111 25.2%
60-90k 310 27.7%
90-120k 449 28.7%
120-150k 340 31.8%
150k+ 308 33.8%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 13 yrs 31.4% 14 yrs 30.2% 15 yrs 28.3% 16 yrs 28.5% 17 yrs 30.6%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

By fuel type

Fail rate by fuel type — 2008 Kubistar
Fuel Tests Fail rate
Diesel 1,517 30.0%
Petrol 30 23.3%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2008 Kubistar
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 373 31.4%
2022 358 30.2%
2023 314 28.3%
2024 267 28.5%
2025 235 30.6%

What to check before buying a 2008 Kubistar

On a 2008 Kubistar, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 18.6% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2008 Nissan Kubistars pass their MOT?

70.1% of the 1,547 2008 Nissan Kubistar MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 29.9% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2008 Nissan Kubistar?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 18.6% of tests, followed by brakes (12.2%).

Does the 2008 Kubistar get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 25.2% in the 30-60k band to 33.8% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 1,547 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data