2002 Mitsubishi Space Wagon — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2002 Mitsubishi Space Wagon passed 68.0% of its 388 recorded MOT tests. Against all cars of a similar age (27.5% fail rate), the 2002 Space Wagon comes out 4.5pp worse. Failures cluster in suspension, lighting & signalling and body, structure & corrosion.

68%
Pass rate
388
MOT tests analysed
32.0%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
20.5
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: suspension, recorded in 20.1% of tests against 15.5% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are component mounting prescribed areas, catalyst emissions and headlamp — component mounting prescribed areas alone was recorded 56 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 60-90k one: 39.5% versus 27.7%.

Suspension is the most common advisory, noted on 42.5% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2002 Space Wagon 32.0% cars avg 24.3% National avg 27.5%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2002 Mitsubishi Space Wagon
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 20.1% 78
2 Lighting & signalling 15.5% 60
3 Body, structure & corrosion 9.8% 38
4 Brakes 9.5% 37
5 Visibility 7.7% 30
6 Emissions & environmental 7.7% 30
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 20.1% Lighting & signalling 15.5% Body, structure & corrosion 9.8% Brakes 9.5% Visibility 7.7% Emissions & environmental 7.7%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2002 Mitsubishi Space Wagon
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Component mounting prescribed areas56
2Catalyst emissions27
3Headlamp27
4Headlamp aim25
5Prescribed areas24
6Wipers23

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2002 Mitsubishi Space Wagon
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 42.5% 165
2 Brakes 37.4% 145
3 Lighting & signalling 27.8% 108
4 Tyres 27.3% 106
5 Other defects 22.9% 89
6 Emissions & environmental 18.6% 72

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 60-90k 27.7% 90-120k 31.0% 120-150k 37.1% 150k+ 39.5%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2002 Space Wagon
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
60-90k 94 27.7%
90-120k 129 31.0%
120-150k 105 37.1%
150k+ 38 39.5%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 19 yrs 32.5% 20 yrs 30.5% 21 yrs 29.9% 22 yrs 35.7% 23 yrs 32.6%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2002 Space Wagon
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 114 32.5%
2022 95 30.5%
2023 77 29.9%
2024 56 35.7%
2025 46 32.6%

What to check before buying a 2002 Space Wagon

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: suspension accounted for 20.1% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2002 Mitsubishi Space Wagons pass their MOT?

68.0% of the 388 2002 Mitsubishi Space Wagon MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 32.0% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2002 Mitsubishi Space Wagon?

Suspension, recorded in 20.1% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (15.5%).

Does the 2002 Space Wagon get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 27.7% in the 60-90k band to 39.5% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 388 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data