1998 Mitsubishi L200 — MOT failures & pass rate

798 MOT tests on the 1998 Mitsubishi L200 are in this dataset, and 70.2% of them passed. Pick-up trucks of a similar age fail 27.9% of the time, so this is 1.9pp worse than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, body, structure & corrosion and suspension.

70%
Pass rate
798
MOT tests analysed
29.8%
Fail rate
worse than
vs pick-up trucks of similar age
24.8
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: lighting & signalling, recorded in 19.6% of tests against 16.4% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are position lamp, chassis condition and component mounting prescribed areas — position lamp alone was recorded 90 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 22.0% of 30-60k cars fail, rising to 29.8% once past 150k.

Suspension is the most common advisory, noted on 39.5% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 1998 L200 29.8% pick-up trucks avg 27.9% National avg 25.6%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 1998 Mitsubishi L200
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 19.6% 156
2 Body, structure & corrosion 16.4% 131
3 Suspension 14.7% 117
4 Brakes 11.5% 92
5 Visibility 7.6% 61
6 Steering 6.1% 49
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 19.6% Body, structure & corrosion 16.4% Suspension 14.7% Brakes 11.5% Visibility 7.6% Steering 6.1%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 1998 Mitsubishi L200
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Position lamp90
2Chassis condition89
3Component mounting prescribed areas77
4Service brake performance56
5Rigid brake pipes55
6Rear fog lamp52

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 1998 Mitsubishi L200
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 39.5% 315
2 Brakes 38.2% 305
3 Body, structure & corrosion 36.7% 293
4 Emissions & environmental 28.8% 230
5 Tyres 18.6% 148
6 Steering 17.4% 139

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 22.0% 60-90k 22.2% 90-120k 30.5% 120-150k 33.6% 150k+ 29.8%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 1998 L200
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 59 22.0%
60-90k 72 22.2%
90-120k 151 30.5%
120-150k 262 33.6%
150k+ 248 29.8%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 23 yrs 30.6% 24 yrs 28.9% 25 yrs 29.2%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 1998 L200
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 199 30.6%
2022 180 28.9%
2023 154 29.2%
2024 144 29.9%
2025 121 30.6%

What to check before buying a 1998 L200

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 19.6% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 1998 Mitsubishi L200s pass their MOT?

70.2% of the 798 1998 Mitsubishi L200 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 29.8% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 1998 Mitsubishi L200?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 19.6% of tests, followed by body, structure & corrosion (16.4%).

Does the 1998 L200 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 22.0% in the 30-60k band to 29.8% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 798 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data