2004 Mitsubishi Grandis — MOT failures & pass rate

1,288 MOT tests on the 2004 Mitsubishi Grandis are in this dataset, and 67.9% of them passed. That is 2.1 percentage points worse than MPVs of a similar age, which fail at 30.1%. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and emissions & environmental.

68%
Pass rate
1,288
MOT tests analysed
32.1%
Fail rate
worse than
vs MPVs of similar age
18.7
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Lighting & signalling dominates the failure mix at 21.7% of all tests — 5.1 points clear of suspension, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp, headlamp aim and position lamp — headlamp alone was recorded 170 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 30-60k one: 39.4% versus 28.3%.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 40.9% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2004 Grandis 32.1% MPVs avg 30.1% National avg 27.7%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2004 Mitsubishi Grandis
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 21.7% 280
2 Suspension 16.6% 214
3 Emissions & environmental 13.1% 169
4 Brakes 11.1% 143
5 Body, structure & corrosion 8.1% 104
6 Visibility 7.9% 102
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 21.7% Suspension 16.6% Emissions & environmental 13.1% Brakes 11.1% Body, structure & corrosion 8.1% Visibility 7.9%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2004 Mitsubishi Grandis
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp170
2Headlamp aim159
3Position lamp123
4Malfunction indicator lamp117
5Wipers85
6Exhaust system70

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2004 Mitsubishi Grandis
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 40.9% 527
2 Suspension 35.2% 453
3 Tyres 27.6% 356
4 Lighting & signalling 25.6% 330
5 Other defects 24.5% 316
6 Body, structure & corrosion 22.5% 290

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 28.3% 60-90k 26.0% 90-120k 31.6% 120-150k 33.1% 150k+ 39.4%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2004 Grandis
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 53 28.3%
60-90k 200 26.0%
90-120k 493 31.6%
120-150k 329 33.1%
150k+ 208 39.4%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 17 yrs 32.6% 18 yrs 32.0% 19 yrs 31.5% 20 yrs 32.4% 21 yrs 32.0%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2004 Grandis
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 343 32.6%
2022 303 32.0%
2023 257 31.5%
2024 210 32.4%
2025 175 32.0%

What to check before buying a 2004 Grandis

On a 2004 Grandis, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 21.7% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2004 Mitsubishi Grandiss pass their MOT?

67.9% of the 1,288 2004 Mitsubishi Grandis MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 32.1% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2004 Mitsubishi Grandis?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 21.7% of tests, followed by suspension (16.6%).

Does the 2004 Grandis get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 28.3% in the 30-60k band to 39.4% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 1,288 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data