2000 Mitsubishi Fto — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2000 Mitsubishi Fto passed 70.0% of its 290 recorded MOT tests. That is 3.3 percentage points worse than all cars of a similar age, which fail at 26.7%. Failures cluster in brakes, lighting & signalling and suspension.

70%
Pass rate
290
MOT tests analysed
30.0%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
22.7
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — brakes (17.9%) and lighting & signalling (16.9%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are component mounting prescribed areas, catalyst emissions and service brake performance — component mounting prescribed areas alone was recorded 97 times.

Mileage matters less than usual here: the 2000 Fto fails 28.3% of the time in the 60-90k band and 31.1% at 150k+, a spread of only 2.8 points.

Suspension is the most common advisory, noted on 35.5% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2000 Fto 30.0% cars avg 23.7% National avg 26.7%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2000 Mitsubishi Fto
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Brakes 17.9% 52
2 Lighting & signalling 16.9% 49
3 Suspension 15.5% 45
4 Emissions & environmental 13.5% 39
5 Body, structure & corrosion 5.2% 15
6 Visibility 5.2% 15
Share of tests failing on each category Brakes 17.9% Lighting & signalling 16.9% Suspension 15.5% Emissions & environmental 13.5% Body, structure & corrosion 5.2% Visibility 5.2%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2000 Mitsubishi Fto
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Component mounting prescribed areas97
2Catalyst emissions61
3Service brake performance45
4Rbt (sp)24
5Headlamp22
6Rigid brake pipes17

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2000 Mitsubishi Fto
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 35.5% 103
2 Brakes 30.0% 87
3 Emissions & environmental 22.1% 64
4 Tyres 21.7% 63
5 Body, structure & corrosion 21.0% 61
6 Lighting & signalling 16.9% 49

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 60-90k 28.3% 90-120k 28.1% 120-150k 31.9% 150k+ 31.1%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2000 Fto
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
60-90k 60 28.3%
90-120k 96 28.1%
120-150k 69 31.9%
150k+ 45 31.1%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 21 yrs 26.8% 22 yrs 35.2% 23 yrs 28.8% 24 yrs 31.4% 25 yrs 26.3%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2000 Fto
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 71 26.8%
2022 71 35.2%
2023 59 28.8%
2024 51 31.4%
2025 38 26.3%

What to check before buying a 2000 Fto

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: brakes accounted for 17.9% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2000 Mitsubishi Ftos pass their MOT?

70.0% of the 290 2000 Mitsubishi Fto MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 30.0% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2000 Mitsubishi Fto?

Brakes, recorded in 17.9% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (16.9%).

Does the 2000 Fto get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 28.3% in the 60-90k band to 31.1% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 290 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data