2019 Mitsubishi Delica — MOT failures & pass rate

337 MOT tests on the 2019 Mitsubishi Delica are in this dataset, and 71.8% of them passed. That is 19.2 percentage points worse than all cars of a similar age, which fail at 9.0%. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, body, structure & corrosion and brakes.

72%
Pass rate
337
MOT tests analysed
28.2%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
3.8
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (14.5%) and body, structure & corrosion (11.6%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are joints, rear fog lamp and steering rack — joints alone was recorded 30 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 31.4% in the 60-90k band and 36.4% in the 120-150k band, a 4.9-point spread.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: suspension was flagged on 26.1% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2019 Delica 28.2% cars avg 9.5% National avg 9.0%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2019 Mitsubishi Delica
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 14.5% 49
2 Body, structure & corrosion 11.6% 39
3 Brakes 11.0% 37
4 Suspension 9.5% 32
5 Steering 9.2% 31
6 Visibility 5.0% 17
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 14.5% Body, structure & corrosion 11.6% Brakes 11.0% Suspension 9.5% Steering 9.2% Visibility 5.0%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2019 Mitsubishi Delica
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Joints30
2Rear fog lamp24
3Steering rack23
4Service brake performance22
5Track rod end18
6Headlamp aim18

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2019 Mitsubishi Delica
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 26.1% 88
2 Brakes 22.6% 76
3 Tyres 14.0% 47
4 Other defects 13.7% 46
5 Lighting & signalling 12.2% 41
6 Emissions & environmental 11.3% 38

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 60-90k 31.4% 90-120k 25.8% 120-150k 36.4%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2019 Delica
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
60-90k 124 31.4%
90-120k 97 25.8%
120-150k 55 36.4%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 2 yrs 29.1% 3 yrs 25.7% 4 yrs 28.6% 5 yrs 28.6% 6 yrs 29.4%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2019 Delica
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 79 29.1%
2022 74 25.7%
2023 77 28.6%
2024 56 28.6%
2025 51 29.4%

What to check before buying a 2019 Delica

On a 2019 Delica, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 14.5% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2019 Mitsubishi Delicas pass their MOT?

71.8% of the 337 2019 Mitsubishi Delica MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 28.2% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2019 Mitsubishi Delica?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 14.5% of tests, followed by body, structure & corrosion (11.6%).

Does the 2019 Delica get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 31.4% in the 60-90k band to 36.4% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 337 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data