1999 Mitsubishi 3000 — MOT failures & pass rate

264 MOT tests on the 1999 Mitsubishi 3000 are in this dataset, and 76.5% of them passed. That is 2.6 percentage points better than all cars of a similar age, which fail at 26.1%. Failures cluster in emissions & environmental, suspension and brakes.

77%
Pass rate
264
MOT tests analysed
23.5%
Fail rate
in line with
vs cars of similar age
23.8
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — emissions & environmental (9.5%) and suspension (8.7%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are component mounting prescribed areas, catalyst emissions and headlamp — component mounting prescribed areas alone was recorded 26 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 6.1% of 30-60k cars fail, rising to 28.6% once past 120-150k — 4.7× the risk.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 28.8% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 1999 3000 23.5% cars avg 23.3% National avg 26.1%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 1999 Mitsubishi 3000
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Emissions & environmental 9.5% 25
2 Suspension 8.7% 23
3 Brakes 8.3% 22
4 Lighting & signalling 7.6% 20
5 Visibility 5.7% 15
6 Steering 4.9% 13
Share of tests failing on each category Emissions & environmental 9.5% Suspension 8.7% Brakes 8.3% Lighting & signalling 7.6% Visibility 5.7% Steering 4.9%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 1999 Mitsubishi 3000
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Component mounting prescribed areas26
2Catalyst emissions22
3Headlamp14
4Wipers13
5Rigid brake pipes12
6Emissions not tested9

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 1999 Mitsubishi 3000
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 28.8% 76
2 Suspension 22.4% 59
3 Body, structure & corrosion 16.3% 43
4 Tyres 14.8% 39
5 Emissions & environmental 12.9% 34
6 Steering 12.5% 33

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 6.1% 60-90k 24.0% 90-120k 26.7% 120-150k 28.6%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 1999 3000
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 33 6.1%
60-90k 104 24.0%
90-120k 60 26.7%
120-150k 49 28.6%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 22 yrs 24.6% 23 yrs 27.4% 24 yrs 23.9% 25 yrs 16.0%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 1999 3000
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 61 24.6%
2022 62 27.4%
2023 46 23.9%
2024 50 16.0%
2025 45 24.4%

What to check before buying a 1999 3000

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: emissions & environmental accounted for 9.5% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 1999 Mitsubishi 3000s pass their MOT?

76.5% of the 264 1999 Mitsubishi 3000 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 23.5% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 1999 Mitsubishi 3000?

Emissions & environmental, recorded in 9.5% of tests, followed by suspension (8.7%).

Does the 1999 3000 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 6.1% in the 30-60k band to 28.6% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 264 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data