2002 MINI Cooper — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 1,428 MOT tests, the 2002 MINI Cooper recorded a 68.8% pass rate. Against superminis of a similar age (29.4% fail rate), the 2002 Cooper comes out 1.8pp worse. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, brakes and suspension.

69%
Pass rate
1,428
MOT tests analysed
31.2%
Fail rate
worse than
vs superminis of similar age
20.8
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Lighting & signalling dominates the failure mix at 21.4% of all tests — 8.7 points clear of brakes, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp aim, rigid brake pipes and srs malfunction indicator lamp — headlamp aim alone was recorded 210 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 0-30k one: 32.6% versus 25.4%.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 43.7% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2002 Cooper 31.2% superminis avg 29.4% National avg 27.4%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2002 MINI Cooper
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 21.4% 306
2 Brakes 12.8% 182
3 Suspension 12.4% 177
4 Body, structure & corrosion 10.7% 153
5 Seat belts & restraints 6.8% 97
6 Visibility 5.7% 81
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 21.4% Brakes 12.8% Suspension 12.4% Body, structure & corrosion 10.7% Seat belts & restraints 6.8% Visibility 5.7%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2002 MINI Cooper
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp aim210
2Rigid brake pipes102
3SRS malfunction indicator lamp96
4Joints88
5Headlamp85
6Pins and bushes78

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2002 MINI Cooper
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 43.7% 624
2 Suspension 31.8% 454
3 Emissions & environmental 29.9% 427
4 Tyres 25.8% 368
5 Lighting & signalling 16.4% 234
6 Body, structure & corrosion 15.8% 225

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 25.4% 30-60k 26.7% 60-90k 31.8% 90-120k 32.5% 120-150k 30.3% 150k+ 32.6%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2002 Cooper
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 63 25.4%
30-60k 165 26.7%
60-90k 311 31.8%
90-120k 468 32.5%
120-150k 294 30.3%
150k+ 86 32.6%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 19 yrs 32.3% 20 yrs 31.6% 21 yrs 30.8% 22 yrs 30.2% 23 yrs 30.9%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2002 Cooper
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 325 32.3%
2022 316 31.6%
2023 299 30.8%
2024 258 30.2%
2025 230 30.9%

What to check before buying a 2002 Cooper

On a 2002 Cooper, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 21.4% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2002 MINI Coopers pass their MOT?

68.8% of the 1,428 2002 MINI Cooper MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 31.2% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2002 MINI Cooper?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 21.4% of tests, followed by brakes (12.8%).

Does the 2002 Cooper get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 25.4% in the 0-30k band to 32.6% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 1,428 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data