2001 MG ZT — MOT failures & pass rate

602 MOT tests on the 2001 MG ZT are in this dataset, and 70.8% of them passed. Against large family cars of a similar age (28.1% fail rate), the 2001 ZT comes out 1.2pp worse. Failures cluster in suspension, brakes and lighting & signalling.

71%
Pass rate
602
MOT tests analysed
29.2%
Fail rate
worse than
vs large family cars of similar age
21.7
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — suspension (16.8%) and brakes (14.0%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are component mounting prescribed areas, rigid brake pipes and rbt (sp) — component mounting prescribed areas alone was recorded 69 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 10.3% in the 30-60k band and 19.6% in the 150k+ band, a 9.3-point spread.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 33.9% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2001 ZT 29.2% large family cars avg 28.1% National avg 27.1%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2001 MG ZT
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 16.8% 101
2 Brakes 14.0% 84
3 Lighting & signalling 11.1% 67
4 Body, structure & corrosion 7.8% 47
5 Seat belts & restraints 5.8% 35
6 Visibility 5.5% 33
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 16.8% Brakes 14.0% Lighting & signalling 11.1% Body, structure & corrosion 7.8% Seat belts & restraints 5.8% Visibility 5.5%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2001 MG ZT
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Component mounting prescribed areas69
2Rigid brake pipes44
3Rbt (sp)36
4Headlamp aim31
5Service brake performance30
6Exhaust system25

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2001 MG ZT
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 33.9% 204
2 Suspension 30.6% 184
3 Tyres 17.6% 106
4 Lighting & signalling 17.3% 104
5 Body, structure & corrosion 12.8% 77
6 Other defects 8.5% 51

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 10.3% 60-90k 26.9% 90-120k 33.7% 120-150k 36.4% 150k+ 19.6%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2001 ZT
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 39 10.3%
60-90k 208 26.9%
90-120k 175 33.7%
120-150k 118 36.4%
150k+ 51 19.6%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 20 yrs 27.7% 21 yrs 32.1% 22 yrs 31.4% 23 yrs 25.0% 24 yrs 29.1%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2001 ZT
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 159 27.7%
2022 140 32.1%
2023 121 31.4%
2024 96 25.0%
2025 86 29.1%

What to check before buying a 2001 ZT

On a 2001 ZT, suspension is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 16.8% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2001 MG ZTs pass their MOT?

70.8% of the 602 2001 MG ZT MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 29.2% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2001 MG ZT?

Suspension, recorded in 16.8% of tests, followed by brakes (14.0%).

Does the 2001 ZT get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 10.3% in the 30-60k band to 19.6% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 602 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data