2002 Mercedes-Benz Sl — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 5,831 MOT tests, the 2002 Mercedes-Benz Sl recorded an 84.7% pass rate. That is 7.3 percentage points better than coupes & convertibles of a similar age, which fail at 22.6%. Failures cluster in suspension, lighting & signalling and brakes.

85%
Pass rate
5,831
MOT tests analysed
15.3%
Fail rate
better than
vs coupes & convertibles of similar age
20.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — suspension (6.0%) and lighting & signalling (5.1%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are ball joint, shock absorbers and headlamp aim — ball joint alone was recorded 198 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 9.9% of 0-30k cars fail, rising to 21.4% once past 150k — 2.1× the risk.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 23.4% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2002 Sl 15.3% coupes & convertibles avg 22.6% National avg 27.4%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2002 Mercedes-Benz Sl
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 6.0% 352
2 Lighting & signalling 5.1% 297
3 Brakes 4.6% 266
4 Tyres 3.8% 222
5 Visibility 2.3% 133
6 Emissions & environmental 1.5% 85
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 6.0% Lighting & signalling 5.1% Brakes 4.6% Tyres 3.8% Visibility 2.3% Emissions & environmental 1.5%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2002 Mercedes-Benz Sl
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Ball joint198
2Shock absorbers139
3Headlamp aim111
4Headlamp95
5Ball joint dust cover91
6Rigid brake pipes86

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2002 Mercedes-Benz Sl
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 23.4% 1,364
2 Suspension 20.1% 1,174
3 Tyres 17.8% 1,035
4 Emissions & environmental 7.2% 420
5 Lighting & signalling 6.8% 395
6 Other defects 5.5% 321

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 9.9% 30-60k 11.4% 60-90k 15.7% 90-120k 18.0% 120-150k 20.8% 150k+ 21.4%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2002 Sl
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 342 9.9%
30-60k 1,499 11.4%
60-90k 2,236 15.7%
90-120k 1,252 18.0%
120-150k 370 20.8%
150k+ 103 21.4%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 19 yrs 15.6% 20 yrs 16.2% 21 yrs 14.5% 22 yrs 14.4% 23 yrs 15.5%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2002 Sl
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 1,305 15.6%
2022 1,288 16.2%
2023 1,156 14.5%
2024 1,061 14.4%
2025 1,021 15.5%

What to check before buying a 2002 Sl

On a 2002 Sl, suspension is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 6.0% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2002 Mercedes-Benz Sls pass their MOT?

84.7% of the 5,831 2002 Mercedes-Benz Sl MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 15.3% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2002 Mercedes-Benz Sl?

Suspension, recorded in 6.0% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (5.1%).

Does the 2002 Sl get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 9.9% in the 0-30k band to 21.4% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 5,831 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data