1998 Mercedes-Benz Sl — MOT failures & pass rate

The 1998 Mercedes-Benz Sl passed 85.9% of its 4,031 recorded MOT tests. Against coupes & convertibles of a similar age (21.5% fail rate), the 1998 Sl comes out 7.4pp better. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and brakes.

86%
Pass rate
4,031
MOT tests analysed
14.1%
Fail rate
better than
vs coupes & convertibles of similar age
24.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (7.6%) and suspension (4.8%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are ball joint dust cover, catalyst emissions and headlamp aim — ball joint dust cover alone was recorded 207 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 6.7% of 0-30k cars fail, rising to 21.5% once past 150k — 3.2× the risk.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 24.9% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 1998 Sl 14.1% coupes & convertibles avg 21.5% National avg 25.5%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 1998 Mercedes-Benz Sl
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 7.6% 307
2 Suspension 4.8% 193
3 Brakes 3.5% 142
4 Emissions & environmental 3.4% 136
5 Visibility 3.3% 131
6 Tyres 2.0% 79
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 7.6% Suspension 4.8% Brakes 3.5% Emissions & environmental 3.4% Visibility 3.3% Tyres 2.0%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 1998 Mercedes-Benz Sl
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Ball joint dust cover207
2Catalyst emissions157
3Headlamp aim104
4Side repeaters81
5Wipers81
6Stop lamp77

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 1998 Mercedes-Benz Sl
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 24.9% 1,003
2 Suspension 23.0% 928
3 Tyres 15.8% 636
4 Emissions & environmental 12.6% 509
5 Lighting & signalling 7.6% 307
6 Steering 5.5% 223

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 6.7% 30-60k 10.1% 60-90k 13.1% 90-120k 15.6% 120-150k 17.2% 150k+ 21.5%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 1998 Sl
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 105 6.7%
30-60k 761 10.1%
60-90k 1,325 13.1%
90-120k 1,041 15.6%
120-150k 523 17.2%
150k+ 274 21.5%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 23 yrs 15.3% 24 yrs 13.6% 25 yrs 12.8%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 1998 Sl
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 854 15.3%
2022 865 13.6%
2023 796 12.8%
2024 759 14.2%
2025 757 14.5%

What to check before buying a 1998 Sl

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 7.6% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 1998 Mercedes-Benz Sls pass their MOT?

85.9% of the 4,031 1998 Mercedes-Benz Sl MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 14.1% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 1998 Mercedes-Benz Sl?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 7.6% of tests, followed by suspension (4.8%).

Does the 1998 Sl get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 6.7% in the 0-30k band to 21.5% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 4,031 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data