1996 Mercedes-Benz Sl — MOT failures & pass rate

3,304 MOT tests on the 1996 Mercedes-Benz Sl are in this dataset, and 87.1% of them passed. Against coupes & convertibles of a similar age (20.3% fail rate), the 1996 Sl comes out 7.4pp better. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, brakes and emissions & environmental.

87%
Pass rate
3,304
MOT tests analysed
12.9%
Fail rate
better than
vs coupes & convertibles of similar age
27
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: lighting & signalling, recorded in 7.3% of tests against 3.7% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are catalyst emissions, side repeaters and individual direction indicators — catalyst emissions alone was recorded 132 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 4.5% in the 0-30k band and 19.5% in the 150k+ band, a 15.0-point spread — more than double.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 24.2% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 12.8% of tests failed in 2021 against 14.5% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 1996 Sl 12.9% coupes & convertibles avg 20.3% National avg 24.6%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 1996 Mercedes-Benz Sl
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 7.3% 243
2 Brakes 3.7% 121
3 Emissions & environmental 3.5% 117
4 Visibility 3.1% 103
5 Suspension 2.6% 86
6 Tyres 2.3% 77
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 7.3% Brakes 3.7% Emissions & environmental 3.5% Visibility 3.1% Suspension 2.6% Tyres 2.3%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 1996 Mercedes-Benz Sl
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Catalyst emissions132
2Side repeaters91
3Individual direction indicators76
4Headlamp aim74
5Wipers56
6Rigid brake pipes55

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 1996 Mercedes-Benz Sl
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 24.2% 800
2 Suspension 20.7% 684
3 Emissions & environmental 15.1% 499
4 Tyres 14.9% 492
5 Steering 5.9% 194
6 Lighting & signalling 5.1% 168

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 4.5% 30-60k 8.8% 60-90k 11.8% 90-120k 14.0% 120-150k 15.1% 150k+ 19.5%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 1996 Sl
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 88 4.5%
30-60k 487 8.8%
60-90k 1,011 11.8%
90-120k 979 14.0%
120-150k 484 15.1%
150k+ 251 19.5%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 1996 Sl
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 681 12.8%
2022 689 12.2%
2023 665 13.7%
2024 620 11.5%
2025 649 14.5%

What to check before buying a 1996 Sl

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 7.3% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 1996 Mercedes-Benz Sls pass their MOT?

87.1% of the 3,304 1996 Mercedes-Benz Sl MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 12.9% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 1996 Mercedes-Benz Sl?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 7.3% of tests, followed by brakes (3.7%).

Does the 1996 Sl get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 4.5% in the 0-30k band to 19.5% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 3,304 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data