2010 Mercedes-Benz Cl 500 — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 600 MOT tests, the 2010 Mercedes-Benz Cl 500 recorded an 84.2% pass rate. Against all cars of a similar age (24.4% fail rate), the 2010 Cl 500 comes out 8.6pp better. Failures cluster in brakes, suspension and tyres.

84%
Pass rate
600
MOT tests analysed
15.8%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
12.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — brakes (6.5%) and suspension (5.5%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are rbt (sp), tread depth and shock absorbers — rbt (sp) alone was recorded 19 times.

Mileage matters less than usual here: the 2010 Cl 500 fails 13.9% of the time in the 30-60k band and 17.6% at 120-150k, a spread of only 3.7 points.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 25.5% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 11.6% of tests failed in 2021 against 15.4% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2010 Cl 500 15.8% cars avg 20.8% National avg 24.4%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2010 Mercedes-Benz Cl 500
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Brakes 6.5% 39
2 Suspension 5.5% 33
3 Tyres 4.8% 29
4 Lighting & signalling 4.5% 27
5 Visibility 1.8% 11
6 Emissions & environmental 1.2% 7
Share of tests failing on each category Brakes 6.5% Suspension 5.5% Tyres 4.8% Lighting & signalling 4.5% Visibility 1.8% Emissions & environmental 1.2%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2010 Mercedes-Benz Cl 500
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Rbt (sp)19
2Tread depth14
3Shock absorbers12
4Ball joint12
5Anti-lock braking system11
6Ball joint dust cover9

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2010 Mercedes-Benz Cl 500
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 25.5% 153
2 Suspension 20.2% 121
3 Tyres 19.0% 114
4 Other defects 4.2% 25
5 Visibility 3.5% 21
6 Lighting & signalling 2.5% 15

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 13.9% 60-90k 15.4% 90-120k 21.1% 120-150k 17.6%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2010 Cl 500
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 151 13.9%
60-90k 214 15.4%
90-120k 156 21.1%
120-150k 34 17.6%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 11 yrs 11.6% 12 yrs 19.5% 13 yrs 16.5% 14 yrs 15.8% 15 yrs 15.4%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2010 Cl 500
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 121 11.6%
2022 128 19.5%
2023 121 16.5%
2024 120 15.8%
2025 110 15.4%

What to check before buying a 2010 Cl 500

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: brakes accounted for 6.5% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2010 Mercedes-Benz Cl 500s pass their MOT?

84.2% of the 600 2010 Mercedes-Benz Cl 500 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 15.8% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2010 Mercedes-Benz Cl 500?

Brakes, recorded in 6.5% of tests, followed by suspension (5.5%).

Does the 2010 Cl 500 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 13.9% in the 30-60k band to 17.6% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 600 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data