2005 Mercedes-Benz Cl 500 — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2005 Mercedes-Benz Cl 500 passed 83.1% of its 924 recorded MOT tests. Against all cars of a similar age (27.6% fail rate), the 2005 Cl 500 comes out 10.7pp better. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and brakes.

83%
Pass rate
924
MOT tests analysed
16.9%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
17.8
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (7.8%) and suspension (6.1%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are ball joint, rigid brake pipes and headlamp aim — ball joint alone was recorded 32 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 0-30k one: 22.6% versus 0.0%.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 29.9% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 18.7% in 2021 to 14.5% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2005 Cl 500 16.9% cars avg 23.9% National avg 27.6%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2005 Mercedes-Benz Cl 500
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 7.8% 72
2 Suspension 6.1% 56
3 Brakes 4.5% 42
4 Tyres 3.8% 35
5 Visibility 2.4% 22
6 Steering 1.5% 14
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 7.8% Suspension 6.1% Brakes 4.5% Tyres 3.8% Visibility 2.4% Steering 1.5%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2005 Mercedes-Benz Cl 500
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Ball joint32
2Rigid brake pipes29
3Headlamp aim27
4Shock absorbers27
5Side repeaters20
6Tread depth20

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2005 Mercedes-Benz Cl 500
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 29.9% 276
2 Suspension 26.1% 241
3 Tyres 25.2% 233
4 Lighting & signalling 10.2% 94
5 Emissions & environmental 9.2% 85
6 Visibility 7.1% 66

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 0.0% 30-60k 5.9% 60-90k 18.4% 90-120k 17.1% 120-150k 22.9% 150k+ 22.6%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2005 Cl 500
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 35 0.0%
30-60k 101 5.9%
60-90k 272 18.4%
90-120k 304 17.1%
120-150k 157 22.9%
150k+ 53 22.6%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 16 yrs 18.7% 17 yrs 16.3% 18 yrs 16.7% 19 yrs 17.5% 20 yrs 14.5%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2005 Cl 500
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 230 18.7%
2022 196 16.3%
2023 186 16.7%
2024 160 17.5%
2025 152 14.5%

What to check before buying a 2005 Cl 500

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 7.8% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2005 Mercedes-Benz Cl 500s pass their MOT?

83.1% of the 924 2005 Mercedes-Benz Cl 500 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 16.9% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2005 Mercedes-Benz Cl 500?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 7.8% of tests, followed by suspension (6.1%).

Does the 2005 Cl 500 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 0.0% in the 0-30k band to 22.6% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 924 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data