2002 Mercedes-Benz Cl 500 — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 1,479 MOT tests, the 2002 Mercedes-Benz Cl 500 recorded an 80.2% pass rate. That is 7.6 percentage points better than all cars of a similar age, which fail at 27.4%. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and brakes.

80%
Pass rate
1,479
MOT tests analysed
19.8%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
20.7
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (10.2%) and suspension (8.5%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are rigid brake pipes, ball joint and position lamp — rigid brake pipes alone was recorded 67 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 13.1% in the 30-60k band and 25.2% in the 150k+ band, a 12.1-point spread.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 32.9% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2002 Cl 500 19.8% cars avg 24.3% National avg 27.4%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2002 Mercedes-Benz Cl 500
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 10.2% 151
2 Suspension 8.5% 125
3 Brakes 6.9% 102
4 Tyres 5.1% 75
5 Body, structure & corrosion 3.7% 55
6 Visibility 2.7% 40
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 10.2% Suspension 8.5% Brakes 6.9% Tyres 5.1% Body, structure & corrosion 3.7% Visibility 2.7%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2002 Mercedes-Benz Cl 500
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Rigid brake pipes67
2Ball joint60
3Position lamp59
4Tread depth50
5Shock absorbers47
6Individual direction indicators47

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2002 Mercedes-Benz Cl 500
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 32.9% 487
2 Suspension 30.0% 444
3 Tyres 22.6% 334
4 Body, structure & corrosion 13.9% 205
5 Emissions & environmental 13.0% 192
6 Lighting & signalling 12.7% 188

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 13.1% 60-90k 20.9% 90-120k 18.2% 120-150k 20.7% 150k+ 25.2%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2002 Cl 500
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 107 13.1%
60-90k 350 20.9%
90-120k 434 18.2%
120-150k 406 20.7%
150k+ 147 25.2%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 19 yrs 21.8% 20 yrs 17.5% 21 yrs 18.6% 22 yrs 20.2% 23 yrs 20.6%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2002 Cl 500
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 395 21.8%
2022 308 17.5%
2023 295 18.6%
2024 258 20.2%
2025 223 20.6%

What to check before buying a 2002 Cl 500

On a 2002 Cl 500, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 10.2% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2002 Mercedes-Benz Cl 500s pass their MOT?

80.2% of the 1,479 2002 Mercedes-Benz Cl 500 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 19.8% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2002 Mercedes-Benz Cl 500?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 10.2% of tests, followed by suspension (8.5%).

Does the 2002 Cl 500 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 13.1% in the 30-60k band to 25.2% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 1,479 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data