2008 Mercedes-Benz 320 — MOT failures & pass rate

375 MOT tests on the 2008 Mercedes-Benz 320 are in this dataset, and 77.9% of them passed. Against all cars of a similar age (26.2% fail rate), the 2008 320 comes out 4.1pp better. Failures cluster in suspension, brakes and lighting & signalling.

78%
Pass rate
375
MOT tests analysed
22.1%
Fail rate
in line with
vs cars of similar age
14.8
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — suspension (9.3%) and brakes (8.3%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are ball joint, tread depth and track rod end — ball joint alone was recorded 23 times.

Mileage matters less than usual here: the 2008 320 fails 26.8% of the time in the 60-90k band and 22.8% at 150k+, a spread of only 3.9 points.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 33.6% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 15.2% of tests failed in 2021 against 21.1% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2008 320 22.1% cars avg 22.4% National avg 26.2%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2008 Mercedes-Benz 320
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 9.3% 35
2 Brakes 8.3% 31
3 Lighting & signalling 8.0% 30
4 Tyres 6.4% 24
5 Steering 3.2% 12
6 Emissions & environmental 2.9% 11
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 9.3% Brakes 8.3% Lighting & signalling 8.0% Tyres 6.4% Steering 3.2% Emissions & environmental 2.9%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2008 Mercedes-Benz 320
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Ball joint23
2Tread depth19
3Track rod end14
4Rigid brake pipes14
5Headlamp aim10
6Position lamp9

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2008 Mercedes-Benz 320
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 33.6% 126
2 Tyres 24.5% 92
3 Suspension 20.0% 75
4 Emissions & environmental 16.5% 62
5 Body, structure & corrosion 10.7% 40
6 Other defects 8.8% 33

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 60-90k 26.8% 90-120k 18.1% 120-150k 21.0% 150k+ 22.8%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2008 320
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
60-90k 71 26.8%
90-120k 94 18.1%
120-150k 100 21.0%
150k+ 92 22.8%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 13 yrs 15.2% 14 yrs 21.3% 15 yrs 25.0% 16 yrs 28.4% 17 yrs 21.1%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2008 320
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 79 15.2%
2022 89 21.3%
2023 88 25.0%
2024 67 28.4%
2025 52 21.1%

What to check before buying a 2008 320

On a 2008 320, suspension is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 9.3% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2008 Mercedes-Benz 320s pass their MOT?

77.9% of the 375 2008 Mercedes-Benz 320 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 22.1% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2008 Mercedes-Benz 320?

Suspension, recorded in 9.3% of tests, followed by brakes (8.3%).

Does the 2008 320 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 26.8% in the 60-90k band to 22.8% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 375 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data