1982 Mercedes-Benz 280 — MOT failures & pass rate

The 1982 Mercedes-Benz 280 passed 84.5% of its 387 recorded MOT tests. Against all cars of a similar age (18.4% fail rate), the 1982 280 comes out 2.9pp better. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, body, structure & corrosion and suspension.

85%
Pass rate
387
MOT tests analysed
15.5%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
40.4
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: lighting & signalling, recorded in 10.6% of tests against 6.2% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp aim, component mounting prescribed areas and service brake performance — headlamp aim alone was recorded 26 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 11.4% of 30-60k cars fail, rising to 21.3% once past 150k.

Suspension is the most common advisory, noted on 20.2% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 15.0% of tests failed in 2021 against 22.9% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 1982 280 15.5% cars avg 18.6% National avg 18.4%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 1982 Mercedes-Benz 280
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 10.6% 41
2 Body, structure & corrosion 6.2% 24
3 Suspension 5.9% 23
4 Visibility 4.9% 19
5 Brakes 4.9% 19
6 Emissions & environmental 2.8% 11
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 10.6% Body, structure & corrosion 6.2% Suspension 5.9% Visibility 4.9% Brakes 4.9% Emissions & environmental 2.8%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 1982 Mercedes-Benz 280
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp aim26
2Component mounting prescribed areas24
3Service brake performance21
4Washers15
5Position lamp13
6Chassis condition11

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 1982 Mercedes-Benz 280
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 20.2% 78
2 Emissions & environmental 17.8% 69
3 Brakes 17.3% 67
4 Body, structure & corrosion 15.3% 59
5 Tyres 11.1% 43
6 Steering 4.9% 19

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 11.4% 60-90k 14.8% 90-120k 9.6% 120-150k 21.3% 150k+ 21.3%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 1982 280
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 70 11.4%
60-90k 108 14.8%
90-120k 73 9.6%
120-150k 47 21.3%
150k+ 75 21.3%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 1982 280
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 120 15.0%
2022 103 13.6%
2023 72 16.7%
2024 57 14.0%
2025 35 22.9%

What to check before buying a 1982 280

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 10.6% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 1982 Mercedes-Benz 280s pass their MOT?

84.5% of the 387 1982 Mercedes-Benz 280 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 15.5% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 1982 Mercedes-Benz 280?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 10.6% of tests, followed by body, structure & corrosion (6.2%).

Does the 1982 280 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 11.4% in the 30-60k band to 21.3% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 387 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data