2010 Mazda Rx-8 — MOT failures & pass rate

638 MOT tests on the 2010 Mazda Rx-8 are in this dataset, and 79.9% of them passed. Coupes & convertibles of a similar age fail 19.0% of the time, so this is 1.0pp worse than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in emissions & environmental, lighting & signalling and suspension.

80%
Pass rate
638
MOT tests analysed
20.1%
Fail rate
worse than
vs coupes & convertibles of similar age
12.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — emissions & environmental (6.7%) and lighting & signalling (6.3%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are catalyst emissions, headlamp aim and position lamp — catalyst emissions alone was recorded 58 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 9.1% of 0-30k cars fail, rising to 22.9% once past 90-120k — 2.5× the risk.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 23.8% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2010 Rx-8 20.1% coupes & convertibles avg 19.0% National avg 24.3%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2010 Mazda Rx-8
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Emissions & environmental 6.7% 43
2 Lighting & signalling 6.3% 40
3 Suspension 6.3% 40
4 Brakes 5.2% 33
5 Tyres 3.8% 24
6 Visibility 2.8% 18
Share of tests failing on each category Emissions & environmental 6.7% Lighting & signalling 6.3% Suspension 6.3% Brakes 5.2% Tyres 3.8% Visibility 2.8%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2010 Mazda Rx-8
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Catalyst emissions58
2Headlamp aim32
3Position lamp20
4Coil spring19
5Malfunction indicator lamp16
6Tread depth13

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2010 Mazda Rx-8
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 23.8% 152
2 Tyres 17.5% 112
3 Suspension 16.3% 104
4 Body, structure & corrosion 8.0% 51
5 Lighting & signalling 7.7% 49
6 Visibility 5.2% 33

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 9.1% 30-60k 17.2% 60-90k 25.5% 90-120k 22.9%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2010 Rx-8
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 55 9.1%
30-60k 273 17.2%
60-90k 231 25.5%
90-120k 61 22.9%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 11 yrs 23.0% 12 yrs 19.9% 13 yrs 16.7% 14 yrs 16.4% 15 yrs 23.7%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2010 Rx-8
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 148 23.0%
2022 136 19.9%
2023 126 16.7%
2024 110 16.4%
2025 118 23.7%

What to check before buying a 2010 Rx-8

On a 2010 Rx-8, emissions & environmental is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 6.7% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2010 Mazda Rx-8s pass their MOT?

79.9% of the 638 2010 Mazda Rx-8 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 20.1% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2010 Mazda Rx-8?

Emissions & environmental, recorded in 6.7% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (6.3%).

Does the 2010 Rx-8 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 9.1% in the 0-30k band to 22.9% in the 90-120k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 638 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data