2000 Mazda Premacy — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2000 Mazda Premacy passed 71.2% of its 285 recorded MOT tests. Against all cars of a similar age (26.9% fail rate), the 2000 Premacy comes out 1.9pp worse. Failures cluster in suspension, lighting & signalling and brakes.

71%
Pass rate
285
MOT tests analysed
28.8%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
22.3
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — suspension (17.9%) and lighting & signalling (16.8%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are component mounting prescribed areas, headlamp and headlamp aim — component mounting prescribed areas alone was recorded 26 times.

A 120-150k example is materially riskier than a 30-60k one: 34.8% versus 23.8%.

Suspension is the most common advisory, noted on 46.0% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 32.7% in 2021 to 27.3% in 2024, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2000 Premacy 28.8% cars avg 23.8% National avg 26.9%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2000 Mazda Premacy
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 17.9% 51
2 Lighting & signalling 16.8% 48
3 Brakes 13.0% 37
4 Emissions & environmental 8.4% 24
5 Tyres 7.7% 22
6 Body, structure & corrosion 7.4% 21
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 17.9% Lighting & signalling 16.8% Brakes 13.0% Emissions & environmental 8.4% Tyres 7.7% Body, structure & corrosion 7.4%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2000 Mazda Premacy
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Component mounting prescribed areas26
2Headlamp26
3Headlamp aim26
4Linkage ball joints21
5Catalyst emissions21
6Service brake performance20

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2000 Mazda Premacy
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 46.0% 131
2 Tyres 29.8% 85
3 Brakes 28.8% 82
4 Body, structure & corrosion 20.0% 57
5 Other defects 18.6% 53
6 Lighting & signalling 17.9% 51

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 23.8% 60-90k 24.7% 90-120k 33.3% 120-150k 34.8%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2000 Premacy
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 63 23.8%
60-90k 81 24.7%
90-120k 87 33.3%
120-150k 46 34.8%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 21 yrs 32.7% 22 yrs 29.7% 23 yrs 21.3% 24 yrs 27.3%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2000 Premacy
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 104 32.7%
2022 74 29.7%
2023 47 21.3%
2024 33 27.3%

What to check before buying a 2000 Premacy

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: suspension accounted for 17.9% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2000 Mazda Premacys pass their MOT?

71.2% of the 285 2000 Mazda Premacy MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 28.8% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2000 Mazda Premacy?

Suspension, recorded in 17.9% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (16.8%).

Does the 2000 Premacy get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 23.8% in the 30-60k band to 34.8% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 285 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data