1997 Mazda Mx-3 — MOT failures & pass rate

The 1997 Mazda Mx-3 passed 71.0% of its 355 recorded MOT tests. That is 3.9 percentage points worse than all cars of a similar age, which fail at 25.1%. Failures cluster in suspension, brakes and lighting & signalling.

71%
Pass rate
355
MOT tests analysed
29.0%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
25.8
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — suspension (14.6%) and brakes (14.1%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are component mounting prescribed areas, service brake performance and headlamp aim — component mounting prescribed areas alone was recorded 58 times.

A 120-150k example is materially riskier than a 30-60k one: 30.2% versus 20.2%.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 36.9% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 31.0% in 2021 to 23.2% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 1997 Mx-3 29.0% cars avg 22.8% National avg 25.1%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 1997 Mazda Mx-3
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 14.6% 52
2 Brakes 14.1% 50
3 Lighting & signalling 13.8% 49
4 Visibility 7.3% 26
5 Body, structure & corrosion 7.0% 25
6 Emissions & environmental 5.6% 20
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 14.6% Brakes 14.1% Lighting & signalling 13.8% Visibility 7.3% Body, structure & corrosion 7.0% Emissions & environmental 5.6%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 1997 Mazda Mx-3
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Component mounting prescribed areas58
2Service brake performance28
3Headlamp aim22
4Catalyst emissions17
5Washers16
6Integral vehicle structure condition15

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 1997 Mazda Mx-3
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 36.9% 131
2 Suspension 36.3% 129
3 Tyres 26.2% 93
4 Emissions & environmental 22.3% 79
5 Body, structure & corrosion 16.6% 59
6 Steering 6.2% 22

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 20.2% 60-90k 28.4% 90-120k 37.3% 120-150k 30.2%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 1997 Mx-3
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 94 20.2%
60-90k 74 28.4%
90-120k 126 37.3%
120-150k 43 30.2%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 24 yrs 31.0% 25 yrs 30.4%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 1997 Mx-3
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 87 31.0%
2022 79 30.4%
2023 66 28.8%
2024 67 29.8%
2025 56 23.2%

What to check before buying a 1997 Mx-3

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: suspension accounted for 14.6% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 1997 Mazda Mx-3s pass their MOT?

71.0% of the 355 1997 Mazda Mx-3 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 29.0% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 1997 Mazda Mx-3?

Suspension, recorded in 14.6% of tests, followed by brakes (14.1%).

Does the 1997 Mx-3 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 20.2% in the 30-60k band to 30.2% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 355 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data