2017 Mazda E Series — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2017 Mazda E Series passed 76.0% of its 810 recorded MOT tests. Against all cars of a similar age (12.3% fail rate), the 2017 E Series comes out 11.7pp worse. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and brakes.

76%
Pass rate
810
MOT tests analysed
23.9%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
5.8
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: lighting & signalling, recorded in 15.9% of tests against 7.0% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp aim, rear fog lamp and headlamp — headlamp aim alone was recorded 72 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 15.8% in the 30-60k band and 29.6% in the 150k+ band, a 13.8-point spread.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 20.3% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 20.6% of tests failed in 2021 against 28.3% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2017 E Series 23.9% cars avg 11.8% National avg 12.3%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2017 Mazda E Series
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 15.9% 129
2 Suspension 7.0% 57
3 Brakes 6.5% 53
4 Emissions & environmental 5.4% 44
5 Visibility 4.8% 39
6 Body, structure & corrosion 3.1% 25
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 15.9% Suspension 7.0% Brakes 6.5% Emissions & environmental 5.4% Visibility 4.8% Body, structure & corrosion 3.1%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2017 Mazda E Series
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp aim72
2Rear fog lamp55
3Headlamp40
4Position lamp35
5Ball joint dust cover33
6Wipers30

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2017 Mazda E Series
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 20.3% 164
2 Suspension 18.6% 151
3 Tyres 15.7% 127
4 Lighting & signalling 14.8% 120
5 Emissions & environmental 11.2% 91
6 Other defects 8.5% 69

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 15.8% 60-90k 20.7% 90-120k 22.7% 120-150k 29.8% 150k+ 29.6%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2017 E Series
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 76 15.8%
60-90k 217 20.7%
90-120k 247 22.7%
120-150k 161 29.8%
150k+ 108 29.6%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 4 yrs 20.6% 5 yrs 23.5% 6 yrs 26.7% 7 yrs 20.7% 8 yrs 28.3%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2017 E Series
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 184 20.6%
2022 187 23.5%
2023 191 26.7%
2024 121 20.7%
2025 127 28.3%

What to check before buying a 2017 E Series

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 15.9% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2017 Mazda E Seriess pass their MOT?

76.0% of the 810 2017 Mazda E Series MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 23.9% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2017 Mazda E Series?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 15.9% of tests, followed by suspension (7.0%).

Does the 2017 E Series get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 15.8% in the 30-60k band to 29.6% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 810 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data