2003 Mazda Demio — MOT failures & pass rate

560 MOT tests on the 2003 Mazda Demio are in this dataset, and 67.9% of them passed. Against all cars of a similar age (27.7% fail rate), the 2003 Demio comes out 4.5pp worse. Failures cluster in suspension, lighting & signalling and body, structure & corrosion.

68%
Pass rate
560
MOT tests analysed
32.1%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
19.5
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: suspension, recorded in 19.5% of tests against 11.4% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are component mounting prescribed areas, joints and headlamp aim — component mounting prescribed areas alone was recorded 159 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 27.7% of 30-60k cars fail, rising to 35.7% once past 120-150k.

Suspension is the most common advisory, noted on 39.1% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 31.6% of tests failed in 2021 against 36.2% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2003 Demio 32.1% cars avg 24.3% National avg 27.7%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2003 Mazda Demio
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 19.5% 109
2 Lighting & signalling 11.4% 64
3 Body, structure & corrosion 9.6% 54
4 Brakes 7.5% 42
5 Visibility 6.1% 34
6 Tyres 5.4% 30
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 19.5% Lighting & signalling 11.4% Body, structure & corrosion 9.6% Brakes 7.5% Visibility 6.1% Tyres 5.4%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2003 Mazda Demio
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Component mounting prescribed areas159
2Joints39
3Headlamp aim33
4Wipers28
5Headlamp27
6Position lamp21

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2003 Mazda Demio
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 39.1% 219
2 Brakes 24.8% 139
3 Tyres 23.9% 134
4 Body, structure & corrosion 16.3% 91
5 Other defects 13.6% 76
6 Lighting & signalling 12.1% 68

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 27.7% 60-90k 35.9% 90-120k 33.8% 120-150k 35.7%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2003 Demio
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 188 27.7%
60-90k 220 35.9%
90-120k 80 33.8%
120-150k 42 35.7%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 18 yrs 31.6% 19 yrs 31.3% 20 yrs 33.6% 21 yrs 28.9% 22 yrs 36.2%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2003 Demio
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 171 31.6%
2022 131 31.3%
2023 113 33.6%
2024 76 28.9%
2025 69 36.2%

What to check before buying a 2003 Demio

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: suspension accounted for 19.5% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2003 Mazda Demios pass their MOT?

67.9% of the 560 2003 Mazda Demio MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 32.1% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2003 Mazda Demio?

Suspension, recorded in 19.5% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (11.4%).

Does the 2003 Demio get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 27.7% in the 30-60k band to 35.7% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 560 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data