2020 Mazda CX-30 — MOT failures & pass rate

The 2020 Mazda CX-30 passed 94.2% of its 19,890 recorded MOT tests. Small SUVs of a similar age fail 7.9% of the time, so this is 2.2pp better than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in tyres, visibility and brakes.

94%
Pass rate
19,890
MOT tests analysed
5.8%
Fail rate
better than
vs small SUVs of similar age
4
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — tyres (2.8%) and visibility (2.5%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are wipers, tread depth and headlamp aim — wipers alone was recorded 428 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 4.2% in the 0-30k band and 11.9% in the 90-120k band, a 7.7-point spread — more than double.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 19.1% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 2.4% of tests failed in 2022 against 7.2% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2020 CX-30 5.8% small SUVs avg 7.9% National avg 9.3%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2020 Mazda CX-30
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Tyres 2.8% 563
2 Visibility 2.5% 505
3 Brakes 1.4% 269
4 Lighting & signalling 1.0% 192
5 Emissions & environmental 0.6% 122
6 Suspension 0.6% 119
Share of tests failing on each category Tyres 2.8% Visibility 2.5% Brakes 1.4% Lighting & signalling 1.0% Emissions & environmental 0.6% Suspension 0.6%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2020 Mazda CX-30
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Wipers428
2Tread depth221
3Headlamp aim215
4Brake pads208
5Washers172
6Malfunction indicator lamp112

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2020 Mazda CX-30
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 19.1% 3,790
2 Tyres 17.6% 3,501
3 Suspension 6.3% 1,255
4 Other defects 4.9% 981
5 Visibility 3.0% 591
6 Lighting & signalling 0.3% 58

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 4.2% 30-60k 8.5% 60-90k 9.6% 90-120k 11.9%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2020 CX-30
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 12,791 4.2%
30-60k 6,569 8.5%
60-90k 477 9.6%
90-120k 42 11.9%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 2 yrs 2.4% 3 yrs 4.3% 4 yrs 6.0% 5 yrs 7.2%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

By fuel type

Fail rate by fuel type — 2020 CX-30
Fuel Tests Fail rate
Petrol 19,740 5.8%
Hybrid 150 5.3%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2020 CX-30
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2022 251 2.4%
2023 6,544 4.3%
2024 6,461 6.0%
2025 6,633 7.2%

What to check before buying a 2020 CX-30

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: tyres accounted for 2.8% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2020 Mazda CX-30s pass their MOT?

94.2% of the 19,890 2020 Mazda CX-30 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 5.8% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2020 Mazda CX-30?

Tyres, recorded in 2.8% of tests, followed by visibility (2.5%).

Does the 2020 CX-30 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 4.2% in the 0-30k band to 11.9% in the 90-120k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 19,890 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data