2006 Mazda Bt-50 — MOT failures & pass rate

510 MOT tests on the 2006 Mazda Bt-50 are in this dataset, and 71.4% of them passed. That is 1.3 percentage points worse than all cars of a similar age, which fail at 27.3%. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, brakes and body, structure & corrosion.

71%
Pass rate
510
MOT tests analysed
28.6%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
16.7
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Lighting & signalling dominates the failure mix at 21.6% of all tests — 9.4 points clear of brakes, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are position lamp, rigid brake pipes and rear fog lamp — position lamp alone was recorded 50 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 32.1% of 60-90k cars fail, rising to 27.7% once past 150k.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 37.5% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 28.1% of tests failed in 2021 against 34.1% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2006 Bt-50 28.6% cars avg 23.5% National avg 27.3%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2006 Mazda Bt-50
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 21.6% 110
2 Brakes 12.2% 62
3 Body, structure & corrosion 12.0% 61
4 Suspension 10.8% 55
5 Visibility 7.1% 36
6 Steering 4.3% 22
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 21.6% Brakes 12.2% Body, structure & corrosion 12.0% Suspension 10.8% Visibility 7.1% Steering 4.3%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2006 Mazda Bt-50
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Position lamp50
2Rigid brake pipes50
3Rear fog lamp34
4Headlamp aim30
5Joints30
6Chassis condition30

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2006 Mazda Bt-50
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 37.5% 191
2 Suspension 31.6% 161
3 Body, structure & corrosion 29.4% 150
4 Lighting & signalling 25.1% 128
5 Tyres 17.8% 91
6 Steering 14.3% 73

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 60-90k 32.1% 90-120k 24.6% 120-150k 30.8% 150k+ 27.7%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2006 Bt-50
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
60-90k 106 32.1%
90-120k 114 24.6%
120-150k 130 30.8%
150k+ 137 27.7%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 15 yrs 28.1% 16 yrs 29.8% 17 yrs 25.3% 18 yrs 25.9% 19 yrs 34.1%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2006 Bt-50
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 135 28.1%
2022 114 29.8%
2023 95 25.3%
2024 81 25.9%
2025 85 34.1%

What to check before buying a 2006 Bt-50

On a 2006 Bt-50, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 21.6% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2006 Mazda Bt-50s pass their MOT?

71.4% of the 510 2006 Mazda Bt-50 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 28.6% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2006 Mazda Bt-50?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 21.6% of tests, followed by brakes (12.2%).

Does the 2006 Bt-50 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 32.1% in the 60-90k band to 27.7% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 510 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data