1998 Mazda 626 — MOT failures & pass rate

387 MOT tests on the 1998 Mazda 626 are in this dataset, and 69.8% of them passed. All cars of a similar age fail 25.8% of the time, so this is 4.4pp worse than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in brakes, suspension and lighting & signalling.

70%
Pass rate
387
MOT tests analysed
30.2%
Fail rate
worse than
vs cars of similar age
24.4
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — brakes (13.4%) and suspension (13.2%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are component mounting prescribed areas, catalyst emissions and wipers — component mounting prescribed areas alone was recorded 51 times.

A 150k+ example is materially riskier than a 60-90k one: 42.2% versus 27.2%.

Suspension is the most common advisory, noted on 43.1% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 30.8% in 2021 to 28.9% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 1998 626 30.2% cars avg 23.1% National avg 25.8%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 1998 Mazda 626
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Brakes 13.4% 52
2 Suspension 13.2% 51
3 Lighting & signalling 7.5% 29
4 Emissions & environmental 7.5% 29
5 Visibility 6.7% 26
6 Body, structure & corrosion 6.2% 24
Share of tests failing on each category Brakes 13.4% Suspension 13.2% Lighting & signalling 7.5% Emissions & environmental 7.5% Visibility 6.7% Body, structure & corrosion 6.2%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 1998 Mazda 626
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Component mounting prescribed areas51
2Catalyst emissions49
3Wipers24
4Prescribed areas16
5Service brake performance16
6Ball joint14

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 1998 Mazda 626
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 43.1% 167
2 Brakes 38.2% 148
3 Tyres 23.8% 92
4 Body, structure & corrosion 20.4% 79
5 Other defects 10.8% 42
6 Emissions & environmental 10.1% 39

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 60-90k 27.2% 90-120k 30.6% 120-150k 33.3% 150k+ 42.2%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 1998 626
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
60-90k 136 27.2%
90-120k 124 30.6%
120-150k 54 33.3%
150k+ 45 42.2%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 23 yrs 30.8% 24 yrs 28.4% 25 yrs 33.3%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 1998 626
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 130 30.8%
2022 88 28.4%
2023 78 33.3%
2024 53 28.3%
2025 38 28.9%

What to check before buying a 1998 626

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: brakes accounted for 13.4% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 1998 Mazda 626s pass their MOT?

69.8% of the 387 1998 Mazda 626 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 30.2% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 1998 Mazda 626?

Brakes, recorded in 13.4% of tests, followed by suspension (13.2%).

Does the 1998 626 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 27.2% in the 60-90k band to 42.2% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 387 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data