2002 Mazda 6 — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 734 MOT tests, the 2002 Mazda 6 recorded a 66.5% pass rate. Against large family cars of a similar age (28.1% fail rate), the 2002 6 comes out 5.4pp worse. Failures cluster in suspension, lighting & signalling and brakes.

66%
Pass rate
734
MOT tests analysed
33.5%
Fail rate
worse than
vs large family cars of similar age
20.4
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — suspension (18.9%) and lighting & signalling (17.0%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are component mounting prescribed areas, position lamp and headlamp aim — component mounting prescribed areas alone was recorded 135 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 16.9% of 30-60k cars fail, rising to 42.6% once past 150k — 2.5× the risk.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: suspension was flagged on 38.8% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2002 6 33.5% large family cars avg 28.1% National avg 27.6%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2002 Mazda 6
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Suspension 18.9% 139
2 Lighting & signalling 17.0% 125
3 Brakes 12.4% 91
4 Body, structure & corrosion 8.9% 65
5 Tyres 7.8% 57
6 Visibility 6.7% 49
Share of tests failing on each category Suspension 18.9% Lighting & signalling 17.0% Brakes 12.4% Body, structure & corrosion 8.9% Tyres 7.8% Visibility 6.7%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2002 Mazda 6
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Component mounting prescribed areas135
2Position lamp63
3Headlamp aim48
4Integral vehicle structure condition47
5Wipers44
6Headlamp40

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2002 Mazda 6
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 38.8% 285
2 Brakes 28.1% 206
3 Tyres 24.9% 183
4 Body, structure & corrosion 18.5% 136
5 Other defects 13.4% 98
6 Lighting & signalling 11.8% 87

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 16.9% 60-90k 27.2% 90-120k 37.6% 120-150k 41.8% 150k+ 42.6%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2002 6
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 77 16.9%
60-90k 224 27.2%
90-120k 210 37.6%
120-150k 158 41.8%
150k+ 61 42.6%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 19 yrs 33.1% 20 yrs 31.7% 21 yrs 33.3% 22 yrs 39.0% 23 yrs 32.8%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2002 6
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 263 33.1%
2022 180 31.7%
2023 129 33.3%
2024 95 39.0%
2025 67 32.8%

What to check before buying a 2002 6

On a 2002 6, suspension is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 18.9% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2002 Mazda 6s pass their MOT?

66.5% of the 734 2002 Mazda 6 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 33.5% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2002 Mazda 6?

Suspension, recorded in 18.9% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (17.0%).

Does the 2002 6 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 16.9% in the 30-60k band to 42.6% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 734 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data