2003 Mazda 2 — MOT failures & pass rate

3,124 MOT tests on the 2003 Mazda 2 are in this dataset, and 73.4% of them passed. That is 2.8 percentage points better than superminis of a similar age, which fail at 29.4%. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, brakes and suspension.

73%
Pass rate
3,124
MOT tests analysed
26.6%
Fail rate
better than
vs superminis of similar age
19.6
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: lighting & signalling, recorded in 14.8% of tests against 11.3% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are rigid brake pipes, position lamp and wipers — rigid brake pipes alone was recorded 323 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 6.7% of 0-30k cars fail, rising to 33.8% once past 150k — 5.1× the risk.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 43.0% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2003 2 26.6% superminis avg 29.4% National avg 27.7%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2003 Mazda 2
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 14.8% 464
2 Brakes 11.3% 352
3 Suspension 10.1% 314
4 Visibility 6.8% 211
5 Emissions & environmental 6.6% 205
6 Tyres 6.0% 187
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 14.8% Brakes 11.3% Suspension 10.1% Visibility 6.8% Emissions & environmental 6.6% Tyres 6.0%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2003 Mazda 2
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Rigid brake pipes323
2Position lamp213
3Wipers181
4Headlamp aim172
5Stop lamp127
6Headlamp126

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2003 Mazda 2
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 43.0% 1,345
2 Suspension 31.5% 985
3 Tyres 28.8% 901
4 Lighting & signalling 17.8% 555
5 Other defects 17.6% 549
6 Emissions & environmental 14.6% 456

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 6.7% 30-60k 20.7% 60-90k 26.5% 90-120k 28.4% 120-150k 32.7% 150k+ 33.8%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2003 2
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 75 6.7%
30-60k 546 20.7%
60-90k 1,145 26.5%
90-120k 852 28.4%
120-150k 361 32.7%
150k+ 145 33.8%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 18 yrs 27.4% 19 yrs 27.0% 20 yrs 25.3% 21 yrs 25.2% 22 yrs 27.2%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

By fuel type

Fail rate by fuel type — 2003 2
Fuel Tests Fail rate
Petrol 2,685 26.7%
Diesel 439 25.7%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2003 2
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 922 27.4%
2022 758 27.0%
2023 596 25.3%
2024 469 25.2%
2025 379 27.2%

What to check before buying a 2003 2

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 14.8% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2003 Mazda 2s pass their MOT?

73.4% of the 3,124 2003 Mazda 2 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 26.6% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2003 Mazda 2?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 14.8% of tests, followed by brakes (11.3%).

Does the 2003 2 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 6.7% in the 0-30k band to 33.8% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 3,124 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data