2008 Lotus Exige — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 468 MOT tests, the 2008 Lotus Exige recorded a 90.0% pass rate. Against all cars of a similar age (26.3% fail rate), the 2008 Exige comes out 16.3pp better. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, emissions & environmental and tyres.

90%
Pass rate
468
MOT tests analysed
10.0%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
14.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

Lighting & signalling dominates the failure mix at 6.0% of all tests — 3.4 points clear of emissions & environmental, so it is the first thing to check.

At component level the recurring items are tread depth, headlamp aim and catalyst emissions — tread depth alone was recorded 15 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 7.7% in the 0-30k band and 13.9% in the 60-90k band, a 6.1-point spread.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 12.0% of tests without failing them.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 10.1% in 2021 to 6.2% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2008 Exige 10.0% cars avg 22.5% National avg 26.3%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2008 Lotus Exige
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 6.0% 28
2 Emissions & environmental 2.6% 12
3 Tyres 1.9% 9
4 Other defects 1.5% 7
5 Visibility 1.5% 7
6 Suspension 1.1% 5
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 6.0% Emissions & environmental 2.6% Tyres 1.9% Other defects 1.5% Visibility 1.5% Suspension 1.1%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2008 Lotus Exige
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Tread depth15
2Headlamp aim13
3Catalyst emissions10
4Registration plates9
5Individual direction indicators6
6Position lamp6

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2008 Lotus Exige
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 12.0% 56
2 Tyres 11.5% 54
3 Suspension 10.3% 48
4 Lighting & signalling 4.5% 21
5 Visibility 2.4% 11
6 Emissions & environmental 1.1% 5

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 7.7% 30-60k 10.3% 60-90k 13.9%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2008 Exige
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 155 7.7%
30-60k 243 10.3%
60-90k 65 13.9%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 13 yrs 10.1% 14 yrs 11.6% 15 yrs 7.3% 16 yrs 14.4% 17 yrs 6.2%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2008 Exige
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 99 10.1%
2022 95 11.6%
2023 96 7.3%
2024 97 14.4%
2025 81 6.2%

What to check before buying a 2008 Exige

On a 2008 Exige, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 6.0% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2008 Lotus Exiges pass their MOT?

90.0% of the 468 2008 Lotus Exige MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 10.0% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2008 Lotus Exige?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 6.0% of tests, followed by emissions & environmental (2.6%).

Does the 2008 Exige get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 7.7% in the 0-30k band to 13.9% in the 60-90k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 468 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data