2005 Lotus Exige — MOT failures & pass rate

422 MOT tests on the 2005 Lotus Exige are in this dataset, and 89.3% of them passed. All cars of a similar age fail 27.6% of the time, so this is 17.0pp better than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, visibility and emissions & environmental.

89%
Pass rate
422
MOT tests analysed
10.7%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
18
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (5.2%) and visibility (4.0%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are washers, catalyst emissions and position lamp — washers alone was recorded 15 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 8.0% in the 0-30k band and 15.9% in the 90-120k band, a 7.9-point spread.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 12.8% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 9.5% of tests failed in 2021 against 12.8% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2005 Exige 10.7% cars avg 24.0% National avg 27.6%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2005 Lotus Exige
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 5.2% 22
2 Visibility 4.0% 17
3 Emissions & environmental 3.1% 13
4 Brakes 1.9% 8
5 Suspension 1.7% 7
6 Other defects 1.2% 5
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 5.2% Visibility 4.0% Emissions & environmental 3.1% Brakes 1.9% Suspension 1.7% Other defects 1.2%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2005 Lotus Exige
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Washers15
2Catalyst emissions12
3Position lamp8
4Headlamp7
5Registration plates6
6Malfunction indicator lamp5

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2005 Lotus Exige
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 12.8% 54
2 Tyres 9.2% 39
3 Suspension 8.1% 34
4 Lighting & signalling 5.7% 24
5 Other defects 2.4% 10
6 Visibility 1.9% 8

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 8.0% 30-60k 11.4% 60-90k 11.1% 90-120k 15.9%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2005 Exige
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 137 8.0%
30-60k 149 11.4%
60-90k 81 11.1%
90-120k 44 15.9%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 16 yrs 9.5% 17 yrs 14.3% 18 yrs 10.5% 19 yrs 5.3% 20 yrs 12.8%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2005 Exige
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 84 9.5%
2022 91 14.3%
2023 86 10.5%
2024 75 5.3%
2025 86 12.8%

What to check before buying a 2005 Exige

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 5.2% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2005 Lotus Exiges pass their MOT?

89.3% of the 422 2005 Lotus Exige MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 10.7% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2005 Lotus Exige?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 5.2% of tests, followed by visibility (4.0%).

Does the 2005 Exige get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 8.0% in the 0-30k band to 15.9% in the 90-120k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 422 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data