2000 Lotus Exige — MOT failures & pass rate

276 MOT tests on the 2000 Lotus Exige are in this dataset, and 88.8% of them passed. Against all cars of a similar age (26.5% fail rate), the 2000 Exige comes out 15.3pp better. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, emissions & environmental and visibility.

89%
Pass rate
276
MOT tests analysed
11.2%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
23.1
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (9.1%) and emissions & environmental (6.2%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are catalyst emissions, position lamp and headlamp aim — catalyst emissions alone was recorded 38 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 6.5% of 0-30k cars fail, rising to 16.7% once past 60-90k — 2.6× the risk.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 10.9% of tests without failing them.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 12.5% in 2021 to 10.5% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2000 Exige 11.2% cars avg 23.6% National avg 26.5%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2000 Lotus Exige
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 9.1% 25
2 Emissions & environmental 6.2% 17
3 Visibility 2.2% 6
4 Brakes 2.2% 6
5 Suspension 2.2% 6
6 Steering 0.7% 2
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 9.1% Emissions & environmental 6.2% Visibility 2.2% Brakes 2.2% Suspension 2.2% Steering 0.7%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2000 Lotus Exige
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Catalyst emissions38
2Position lamp10
3Headlamp aim8
4Headlamp5
5Horn4
6Washers4

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2000 Lotus Exige
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 10.9% 30
2 Tyres 7.2% 20
3 Other defects 6.9% 19
4 Suspension 6.5% 18
5 Visibility 3.6% 10
6 Lighting & signalling 2.2% 6

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 6.5% 30-60k 13.3% 60-90k 16.7%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2000 Exige
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 108 6.5%
30-60k 113 13.3%
60-90k 48 16.7%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 21 yrs 12.5% 22 yrs 10.9% 23 yrs 14.8% 24 yrs 7.3% 25 yrs 10.5%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2000 Exige
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 48 12.5%
2022 55 10.9%
2023 61 14.8%
2024 55 7.3%
2025 57 10.5%

What to check before buying a 2000 Exige

On a 2000 Exige, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 9.1% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2000 Lotus Exiges pass their MOT?

88.8% of the 276 2000 Lotus Exige MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 11.2% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2000 Lotus Exige?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 9.1% of tests, followed by emissions & environmental (6.2%).

Does the 2000 Exige get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 6.5% in the 0-30k band to 16.7% in the 60-90k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 276 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data