2011 Lotus Evora S — MOT failures & pass rate

395 MOT tests on the 2011 Lotus Evora S are in this dataset, and 89.4% of them passed. All cars of a similar age fail 23.2% of the time, so this is 12.6pp better than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, tyres and suspension.

89%
Pass rate
395
MOT tests analysed
10.6%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
12
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: lighting & signalling, recorded in 6.1% of tests against 2.5% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp aim, linkage ball joints and tread depth — headlamp aim alone was recorded 19 times.

Mileage matters less than usual here: the 2011 Evora S fails 11.6% of the time in the 0-30k band and 8.8% at 60-90k, a spread of only 2.9 points.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 16.7% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 10.7% in 2021 to 7.6% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2011 Evora S 10.6% cars avg 19.7% National avg 23.2%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2011 Lotus Evora S
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 6.1% 24
2 Tyres 2.5% 10
3 Suspension 2.0% 8
4 Visibility 1.8% 7
5 Seat belts & restraints 1.5% 6
6 Emissions & environmental 1.3% 5
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 6.1% Tyres 2.5% Suspension 2.0% Visibility 1.8% Seat belts & restraints 1.5% Emissions & environmental 1.3%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2011 Lotus Evora S
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp aim19
2Linkage ball joints8
3Tread depth7
4Side repeaters6
5SRS malfunction indicator lamp5
6Washers4

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2011 Lotus Evora S
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 16.7% 66
2 Suspension 16.0% 63
3 Tyres 15.4% 61
4 Lighting & signalling 4.0% 16
5 Other defects 4.0% 16
6 Visibility 1.5% 6

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 11.6% 30-60k 9.9% 60-90k 8.8%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2011 Evora S
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 86 11.6%
30-60k 213 9.9%
60-90k 80 8.8%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 10 yrs 10.7% 11 yrs 12.0% 12 yrs 6.7% 13 yrs 15.7% 14 yrs 7.6%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2011 Evora S
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 75 10.7%
2022 83 12.0%
2023 75 6.7%
2024 83 15.7%
2025 79 7.6%

What to check before buying a 2011 Evora S

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 6.1% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2011 Lotus Evora Ss pass their MOT?

89.4% of the 395 2011 Lotus Evora S MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 10.6% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2011 Lotus Evora S?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 6.1% of tests, followed by tyres (2.5%).

Does the 2011 Evora S get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 11.6% in the 0-30k band to 8.8% in the 60-90k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 395 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data