2009 Lotus Elise — MOT failures & pass rate

510 MOT tests on the 2009 Lotus Elise are in this dataset, and 92.0% of them passed. All cars of a similar age fail 25.4% of the time, so this is 17.4pp better than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, emissions & environmental and tyres.

92%
Pass rate
510
MOT tests analysed
8.0%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
13.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (4.7%) and emissions & environmental (2.2%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp aim, catalyst emissions and position lamp — headlamp aim alone was recorded 12 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 4.5% in the 0-30k band and 9.3% in the 60-90k band, a 4.8-point spread — more than double.

Brakes is the most common advisory, noted on 13.3% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 8.3% of tests failed in 2021 against 10.5% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2009 Elise 8.0% cars avg 21.7% National avg 25.4%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2009 Lotus Elise
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 4.7% 24
2 Emissions & environmental 2.2% 11
3 Tyres 1.8% 9
4 Visibility 1.6% 8
5 Suspension 1.6% 8
6 Brakes 1.4% 7
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 4.7% Emissions & environmental 2.2% Tyres 1.8% Visibility 1.6% Suspension 1.6% Brakes 1.4%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2009 Lotus Elise
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp aim12
2Catalyst emissions11
3Position lamp6
4Shock absorbers6
5Horn5
6Individual direction indicators5

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2009 Lotus Elise
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 13.3% 68
2 Tyres 10.6% 54
3 Suspension 8.8% 45
4 Visibility 2.2% 11
5 Other defects 2.0% 10
6 Lighting & signalling 1.2% 6

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 4.5% 30-60k 9.1% 60-90k 9.3%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2009 Elise
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 133 4.5%
30-60k 329 9.1%
60-90k 43 9.3%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 12 yrs 8.3% 13 yrs 7.3% 14 yrs 7.9% 15 yrs 6.3% 16 yrs 10.5%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2009 Elise
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 108 8.3%
2022 110 7.3%
2023 101 7.9%
2024 96 6.3%
2025 95 10.5%

What to check before buying a 2009 Elise

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 4.7% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2009 Lotus Elises pass their MOT?

92.0% of the 510 2009 Lotus Elise MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 8.0% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2009 Lotus Elise?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 4.7% of tests, followed by emissions & environmental (2.2%).

Does the 2009 Elise get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 4.5% in the 0-30k band to 9.3% in the 60-90k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 510 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data