2006 Lotus Elise — MOT failures & pass rate

1,225 MOT tests on the 2006 Lotus Elise are in this dataset, and 90.2% of them passed. All cars of a similar age fail 27.4% of the time, so this is 17.6pp better than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, visibility and suspension.

90%
Pass rate
1,225
MOT tests analysed
9.8%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
17
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (4.9%) and visibility (3.1%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp aim, washers and catalyst emissions — headlamp aim alone was recorded 40 times.

A 90-120k example is materially riskier than a 0-30k one: 23.3% versus 5.0%.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 15.1% of tests without failing them.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 10.0% in 2021 to 7.4% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2006 Elise 9.8% cars avg 23.6% National avg 27.4%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2006 Lotus Elise
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 4.9% 60
2 Visibility 3.1% 38
3 Suspension 2.0% 25
4 Brakes 2.0% 25
5 Emissions & environmental 1.9% 23
6 Other defects 0.8% 10
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 4.9% Visibility 3.1% Suspension 2.0% Brakes 2.0% Emissions & environmental 1.9% Other defects 0.8%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2006 Lotus Elise
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp aim40
2Washers23
3Catalyst emissions23
4Wipers18
5Shock absorbers17
6Headlamp13

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2006 Lotus Elise
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 15.1% 185
2 Tyres 8.9% 109
3 Suspension 8.2% 101
4 Lighting & signalling 5.1% 63
5 Other defects 2.6% 32
6 Steering 1.5% 18

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 5.0% 30-60k 9.3% 60-90k 15.9% 90-120k 23.3%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2006 Elise
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 337 5.0%
30-60k 622 9.3%
60-90k 226 15.9%
90-120k 30 23.3%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 15 yrs 10.0% 16 yrs 8.4% 17 yrs 11.9% 18 yrs 11.0% 19 yrs 7.4%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2006 Elise
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 249 10.0%
2022 249 8.4%
2023 253 11.9%
2024 245 11.0%
2025 229 7.4%

What to check before buying a 2006 Elise

On a 2006 Elise, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 4.9% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2006 Lotus Elises pass their MOT?

90.2% of the 1,225 2006 Lotus Elise MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 9.8% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2006 Lotus Elise?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 4.9% of tests, followed by visibility (3.1%).

Does the 2006 Elise get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 5.0% in the 0-30k band to 23.3% in the 90-120k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 1,225 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data