2000 Lotus Elise — MOT failures & pass rate

2,680 MOT tests on the 2000 Lotus Elise are in this dataset, and 86.9% of them passed. All cars of a similar age fail 26.5% of the time, so this is 13.4pp better than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, emissions & environmental and visibility.

87%
Pass rate
2,680
MOT tests analysed
13.1%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
23
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (6.7%) and emissions & environmental (6.6%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are catalyst emissions, headlamp aim and position lamp — catalyst emissions alone was recorded 258 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 8.7% in the 0-30k band and 13.0% in the 120-150k band, a 4.3-point spread.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: brakes was flagged on 12.7% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2000 Elise 13.1% cars avg 23.6% National avg 26.5%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2000 Lotus Elise
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 6.7% 180
2 Emissions & environmental 6.6% 178
3 Visibility 3.3% 89
4 Suspension 2.7% 72
5 Brakes 2.0% 53
6 Steering 1.4% 37
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 6.7% Emissions & environmental 6.6% Visibility 3.3% Suspension 2.7% Brakes 2.0% Steering 1.4%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2000 Lotus Elise
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Catalyst emissions258
2Headlamp aim104
3Position lamp72
4Washers63
5Wheel bearings37
6Steering rack32

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2000 Lotus Elise
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Brakes 12.7% 341
2 Suspension 10.9% 293
3 Tyres 7.8% 209
4 Other defects 7.7% 206
5 Steering 3.9% 104
6 Lighting & signalling 3.4% 91

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 8.7% 30-60k 12.7% 60-90k 16.8% 90-120k 15.3% 120-150k 13.0%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2000 Elise
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 643 8.7%
30-60k 1,069 12.7%
60-90k 683 16.8%
90-120k 215 15.3%
120-150k 46 13.0%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 21 yrs 13.6% 22 yrs 14.4% 23 yrs 11.9% 24 yrs 13.4% 25 yrs 12.2%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2000 Elise
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 544 13.6%
2022 555 14.4%
2023 556 11.9%
2024 515 13.4%
2025 510 12.2%

What to check before buying a 2000 Elise

On a 2000 Elise, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 6.7% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2000 Lotus Elises pass their MOT?

86.9% of the 2,680 2000 Lotus Elise MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 13.1% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2000 Lotus Elise?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 6.7% of tests, followed by emissions & environmental (6.6%).

Does the 2000 Elise get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 8.7% in the 0-30k band to 13.0% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 2,680 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data