2005 Lexus Sc430 — MOT failures & pass rate

1,311 MOT tests on the 2005 Lexus Sc430 are in this dataset, and 83.8% of them passed. Against all cars of a similar age (27.6% fail rate), the 2005 Sc430 comes out 11.5pp better. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, brakes and suspension.

84%
Pass rate
1,311
MOT tests analysed
16.2%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
18
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (8.1%) and brakes (5.7%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp aim, shock absorbers and wipers — headlamp aim alone was recorded 51 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 4.9% in the 0-30k band and 26.0% in the 150k+ band, a 21.1-point spread — more than double.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: suspension was flagged on 20.8% of tests without failing them.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2005 Sc430 16.2% cars avg 24.0% National avg 27.6%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2005 Lexus Sc430
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 8.1% 106
2 Brakes 5.7% 75
3 Suspension 5.3% 70
4 Emissions & environmental 4.5% 59
5 Visibility 3.8% 50
6 Tyres 3.5% 46
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 8.1% Brakes 5.7% Suspension 5.3% Emissions & environmental 4.5% Visibility 3.8% Tyres 3.5%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2005 Lexus Sc430
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp aim51
2Shock absorbers50
3Wipers40
4Malfunction indicator lamp32
5Catalyst emissions30
6Position lamp29

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2005 Lexus Sc430
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Suspension 20.8% 273
2 Tyres 17.2% 226
3 Brakes 16.3% 213
4 Body, structure & corrosion 8.6% 113
5 Lighting & signalling 4.1% 54
6 Visibility 2.3% 30

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 4.9% 30-60k 11.8% 60-90k 15.6% 90-120k 20.2% 120-150k 8.9% 150k+ 26.0%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2005 Sc430
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 61 4.9%
30-60k 270 11.8%
60-90k 417 15.6%
90-120k 357 20.2%
120-150k 79 8.9%
150k+ 127 26.0%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 16 yrs 17.0% 17 yrs 14.5% 18 yrs 20.3% 19 yrs 11.5% 20 yrs 16.9%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2005 Sc430
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 282 17.0%
2022 255 14.5%
2023 271 20.3%
2024 243 11.5%
2025 260 16.9%

What to check before buying a 2005 Sc430

On a 2005 Sc430, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 8.1% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2005 Lexus Sc430s pass their MOT?

83.8% of the 1,311 2005 Lexus Sc430 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 16.2% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2005 Lexus Sc430?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 8.1% of tests, followed by brakes (5.7%).

Does the 2005 Sc430 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 4.9% in the 0-30k band to 26.0% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 1,311 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data