2006 Lexus Ls — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 338 MOT tests, the 2006 Lexus Ls recorded an 84.0% pass rate. That is 11.4 percentage points better than all cars of a similar age, which fail at 27.4%. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, suspension and brakes.

84%
Pass rate
338
MOT tests analysed
16.0%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
16.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (8.3%) and suspension (6.5%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are pins and bushes, wipers and tread depth — pins and bushes alone was recorded 38 times.

Mileage matters less than usual here: the 2006 Ls fails 11.9% of the time in the 60-90k band and 12.0% at 150k+, a spread of only 0.1 points.

Tyres is the most common advisory, noted on 24.0% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is improving — the fail rate fell from 23.4% in 2021 to 12.5% in 2025, as the worst-kept examples leave the fleet.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2006 Ls 16.0% cars avg 23.6% National avg 27.4%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2006 Lexus Ls
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 8.3% 28
2 Suspension 6.5% 22
3 Brakes 5.0% 17
4 Tyres 4.4% 15
5 Visibility 3.9% 13
6 Emissions & environmental 1.2% 4
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 8.3% Suspension 6.5% Brakes 5.0% Tyres 4.4% Visibility 3.9% Emissions & environmental 1.2%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2006 Lexus Ls
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Pins and bushes38
2Wipers14
3Tread depth11
4Headlamp aim11
5Position lamp9
6Headlamp7

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2006 Lexus Ls
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 24.0% 81
2 Suspension 23.7% 80
3 Brakes 15.7% 53
4 Lighting & signalling 8.0% 27
5 Body, structure & corrosion 6.8% 23
6 Visibility 4.7% 16

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 60-90k 11.9% 90-120k 18.4% 120-150k 20.0% 150k+ 12.0%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2006 Ls
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
60-90k 84 11.9%
90-120k 109 18.4%
120-150k 65 20.0%
150k+ 50 12.0%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 15 yrs 23.4% 16 yrs 15.3% 17 yrs 13.0% 18 yrs 14.1% 19 yrs 12.5%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2006 Ls
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 77 23.4%
2022 72 15.3%
2023 69 13.0%
2024 64 14.1%
2025 56 12.5%

What to check before buying a 2006 Ls

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 8.3% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2006 Lexus Lss pass their MOT?

84.0% of the 338 2006 Lexus Ls MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 16.0% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2006 Lexus Ls?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 8.3% of tests, followed by suspension (6.5%).

Does the 2006 Ls get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 11.9% in the 60-90k band to 12.0% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 338 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data