2009 Lexus Is250C — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 791 MOT tests, the 2009 Lexus Is250C recorded an 85.0% pass rate. All cars of a similar age fail 25.5% of the time, so this is 10.4pp better than the group it competes with. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, tyres and brakes.

85%
Pass rate
791
MOT tests analysed
15.0%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
14
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (6.2%) and tyres (5.3%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp aim, brake pads and wipers — headlamp aim alone was recorded 30 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 11.2% of 30-60k cars fail, rising to 31.4% once past 120-150k — 2.8× the risk.

Tyres is the most common advisory, noted on 30.3% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 14.2% of tests failed in 2021 against 16.3% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2009 Is250C 15.0% cars avg 21.8% National avg 25.5%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2009 Lexus Is250C
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 6.2% 49
2 Tyres 5.3% 42
3 Brakes 4.7% 37
4 Visibility 3.0% 24
5 Suspension 2.3% 18
6 Emissions & environmental 1.0% 8
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 6.2% Tyres 5.3% Brakes 4.7% Visibility 3.0% Suspension 2.3% Emissions & environmental 1.0%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2009 Lexus Is250C
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp aim30
2Brake pads26
3Wipers23
4Position lamp14
5Tread depth13
6Headlamp11

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2009 Lexus Is250C
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 30.3% 240
2 Brakes 21.9% 173
3 Suspension 9.6% 76
4 Lighting & signalling 9.4% 74
5 Other defects 8.2% 65
6 Body, structure & corrosion 4.8% 38

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 11.2% 60-90k 14.4% 90-120k 14.9% 120-150k 31.4%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2009 Is250C
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 196 11.2%
60-90k 306 14.4%
90-120k 194 14.9%
120-150k 51 31.4%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 12 yrs 14.2% 13 yrs 15.3% 14 yrs 14.1% 15 yrs 15.3% 16 yrs 16.3%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2009 Is250C
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 155 14.2%
2022 163 15.3%
2023 163 14.1%
2024 157 15.3%
2025 153 16.3%

What to check before buying a 2009 Is250C

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 6.2% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2009 Lexus Is250Cs pass their MOT?

85.0% of the 791 2009 Lexus Is250C MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 15.0% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2009 Lexus Is250C?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 6.2% of tests, followed by tyres (5.3%).

Does the 2009 Is250C get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 11.2% in the 30-60k band to 31.4% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 791 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data