2009 Lexus Is250 — MOT failures & pass rate

6,823 MOT tests on the 2009 Lexus Is250 are in this dataset, and 84.8% of them passed. Against all cars of a similar age (25.5% fail rate), the 2009 Is250 comes out 10.3pp better. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, brakes and tyres.

85%
Pass rate
6,823
MOT tests analysed
15.2%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
14
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (8.2%) and brakes (5.8%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp aim, headlamp and position lamp — headlamp aim alone was recorded 304 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 14.6% of 0-30k cars fail, rising to 24.0% once past 150k.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: tyres was flagged on 26.3% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 13.0% of tests failed in 2021 against 17.1% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2009 Is250 15.2% cars avg 21.8% National avg 25.5%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2009 Lexus Is250
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 8.2% 556
2 Brakes 5.8% 396
3 Tyres 5.5% 375
4 Visibility 2.9% 196
5 Emissions & environmental 2.2% 151
6 Suspension 1.9% 127
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 8.2% Brakes 5.8% Tyres 5.5% Visibility 2.9% Emissions & environmental 2.2% Suspension 1.9%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2009 Lexus Is250
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp aim304
2Headlamp251
3Position lamp223
4Wipers175
5Tread depth171
6Brake pads162

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2009 Lexus Is250
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 26.3% 1,794
2 Brakes 20.8% 1,422
3 Suspension 10.3% 701
4 Lighting & signalling 8.9% 606
5 Other defects 8.3% 568
6 Body, structure & corrosion 5.6% 384

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 14.6% 30-60k 11.5% 60-90k 12.6% 90-120k 16.4% 120-150k 19.9% 150k+ 24.0%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2009 Is250
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 151 14.6%
30-60k 1,262 11.5%
60-90k 2,279 12.6%
90-120k 1,726 16.4%
120-150k 947 19.9%
150k+ 458 24.0%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 12 yrs 13.0% 13 yrs 14.2% 14 yrs 16.6% 15 yrs 15.2% 16 yrs 17.1%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2009 Is250
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 1,383 13.0%
2022 1,385 14.2%
2023 1,402 16.6%
2024 1,339 15.2%
2025 1,314 17.1%

What to check before buying a 2009 Is250

On a 2009 Is250, lighting & signalling is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 8.2% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2009 Lexus Is250s pass their MOT?

84.8% of the 6,823 2009 Lexus Is250 MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 15.2% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2009 Lexus Is250?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 8.2% of tests, followed by brakes (5.8%).

Does the 2009 Is250 get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 14.6% in the 0-30k band to 24.0% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 6,823 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data