2008 Lexus Is F — MOT failures & pass rate

349 MOT tests on the 2008 Lexus Is F are in this dataset, and 92.8% of them passed. Against all cars of a similar age (26.4% fail rate), the 2008 Is F comes out 19.2pp better. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, brakes and emissions & environmental.

93%
Pass rate
349
MOT tests analysed
7.2%
Fail rate
better than
vs cars of similar age
15
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — lighting & signalling (4.3%) and brakes (2.6%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are headlamp aim, catalyst emissions and rbt (sp) — headlamp aim alone was recorded 13 times.

Condition tracks the odometer closely. Failures run at 0.0% in the 30-60k band and 12.5% in the 120-150k band, a 12.5-point spread — more than double.

Tyres is the most common advisory, noted on 15.8% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

The trend is worsening — 3.0% of tests failed in 2021 against 11.1% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2008 Is F 7.2% cars avg 22.5% National avg 26.4%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2008 Lexus Is F
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 4.3% 15
2 Brakes 2.6% 9
3 Emissions & environmental 2.0% 7
4 Tyres 2.0% 7
5 Seat belts & restraints 0.9% 3
6 Visibility 0.9% 3
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 4.3% Brakes 2.6% Emissions & environmental 2.0% Tyres 2.0% Seat belts & restraints 0.9% Visibility 0.9%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2008 Lexus Is F
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Headlamp aim13
2Catalyst emissions5
3Rbt (sp)3
4SRS malfunction indicator lamp3
5Wipers3
6Registration plates2

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2008 Lexus Is F
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 15.8% 55
2 Suspension 8.0% 28
3 Brakes 7.7% 27
4 Body, structure & corrosion 5.2% 18
5 Other defects 3.4% 12
6 Visibility 2.6% 9

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 0.0% 60-90k 7.1% 90-120k 7.9% 120-150k 12.5%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2008 Is F
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 36 0.0%
60-90k 113 7.1%
90-120k 101 7.9%
120-150k 64 12.5%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 13 yrs 3.0% 14 yrs 4.5% 15 yrs 8.3% 16 yrs 8.3% 17 yrs 11.1%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2008 Is F
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 66 3.0%
2022 67 4.5%
2023 72 8.3%
2024 72 8.3%
2025 72 11.1%

What to check before buying a 2008 Is F

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 4.3% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2008 Lexus Is Fs pass their MOT?

92.8% of the 349 2008 Lexus Is F MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 7.2% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2008 Lexus Is F?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 4.3% of tests, followed by brakes (2.6%).

Does the 2008 Is F get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 0.0% in the 30-60k band to 12.5% in the 120-150k band.

Methodology & source. Based on 349 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data