2010 Lexus Gs — MOT failures & pass rate

647 MOT tests on the 2010 Lexus Gs are in this dataset, and 85.3% of them passed. Against executive cars of a similar age (20.8% fail rate), the 2010 Gs comes out 6.1pp better. Failures cluster in lighting & signalling, brakes and tyres.

85%
Pass rate
647
MOT tests analysed
14.7%
Fail rate
better than
vs executive cars of similar age
12.9
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

One area stands out: lighting & signalling, recorded in 9.6% of tests against 5.4% for the next-worst category.

At component level the recurring items are position lamp, headlamp aim and shock absorbers — position lamp alone was recorded 37 times.

Mileage is the strongest signal on the record: 9.9% of 30-60k cars fail, rising to 22.8% once past 150k — 2.3× the risk.

Tyres is the most common advisory, noted on 22.9% of tests — work that passed today but is likely due soon.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2010 Gs 14.7% executive cars avg 20.8% National avg 24.4%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2010 Lexus Gs
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Lighting & signalling 9.6% 62
2 Brakes 5.4% 35
3 Tyres 3.5% 23
4 Suspension 2.6% 17
5 Visibility 2.2% 14
6 Body, structure & corrosion 1.6% 10
Share of tests failing on each category Lighting & signalling 9.6% Brakes 5.4% Tyres 3.5% Suspension 2.6% Visibility 2.2% Body, structure & corrosion 1.6%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2010 Lexus Gs
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Position lamp37
2Headlamp aim26
3Shock absorbers23
4Wipers15
5Headlamp14
6Brake pads13

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2010 Lexus Gs
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 22.9% 148
2 Brakes 20.9% 135
3 Suspension 16.7% 108
4 Other defects 6.0% 39
5 Lighting & signalling 5.3% 34
6 Body, structure & corrosion 5.0% 32

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 30-60k 9.9% 60-90k 13.5% 90-120k 14.8% 120-150k 14.9% 150k+ 22.8%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2010 Gs
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
30-60k 91 9.9%
60-90k 156 13.5%
90-120k 209 14.8%
120-150k 121 14.9%
150k+ 57 22.8%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 11 yrs 14.1% 12 yrs 13.4% 13 yrs 13.5% 14 yrs 18.4% 15 yrs 14.2%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

By fuel type

Fail rate by fuel type — 2010 Gs
Fuel Tests Fail rate
Hybrid 297 13.8%
Other 180 12.8%
Petrol 89 22.5%
Electric 81 13.6%

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2010 Gs
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 135 14.1%
2022 134 13.4%
2023 133 13.5%
2024 125 18.4%
2025 120 14.2%

What to check before buying a 2010 Gs

The failure pattern for this year is specific enough to inspect against: lighting & signalling accounted for 9.6% of tests. Start there.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2010 Lexus Gss pass their MOT?

85.3% of the 647 2010 Lexus Gs MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 14.7% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2010 Lexus Gs?

Lighting & signalling, recorded in 9.6% of tests, followed by brakes (5.4%).

Does the 2010 Gs get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 9.9% in the 30-60k band to 22.8% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 647 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data