2016 Lexus Ct — MOT failures & pass rate

Across 15,945 MOT tests, the 2016 Lexus Ct recorded a 92.4% pass rate. Against small family cars of a similar age (13.7% fail rate), the 2016 Ct comes out 6.1pp better. Failures cluster in tyres, lighting & signalling and visibility.

92%
Pass rate
15,945
MOT tests analysed
7.6%
Fail rate
better than
vs small family cars of similar age
7
Avg age at test (yrs)

What the MOT record shows

No single area dominates — tyres (4.4%) and lighting & signalling (3.4%) are close, so failures are spread across several systems rather than one weak point.

At component level the recurring items are wipers, headlamp and tread depth — wipers alone was recorded 487 times.

Mileage matters less than usual here: the 2016 Ct fails 4.9% of the time in the 0-30k band and 8.6% at 150k+, a spread of only 3.6 points.

Advisories point at the next bill rather than this one: tyres was flagged on 22.8% of tests without failing them.

The trend is worsening — 7.1% of tests failed in 2021 against 9.4% in 2025, the usual pattern as a fleet ages.

How it compares

Fail rate vs benchmarks (lower is better) 2016 Ct 7.6% small family cars avg 13.7% National avg 14.5%
Fail rate for this model-year against the segment and national averages for cars of a similar age.

Top failure categories

Most common MOT failure areas — 2016 Lexus Ct
# Category % of tests affected Tests
1 Tyres 4.4% 699
2 Lighting & signalling 3.4% 547
3 Visibility 3.1% 488
4 Brakes 1.9% 304
5 Suspension 0.4% 70
6 Body, structure & corrosion 0.4% 65
Share of tests failing on each category Tyres 4.4% Lighting & signalling 3.4% Visibility 3.1% Brakes 1.9% Suspension 0.4% Body, structure & corrosion 0.4%
Percentage of tests with at least one failure recorded in each category.

Most common specific failures

The exact components most often recorded as failures — more specific than the categories above.

Most frequently recorded failure items — 2016 Lexus Ct
#Failure itemTimes recorded
1Wipers487
2Headlamp322
3Tread depth299
4Headlamp aim218
5Brake pads177
6Tyre pressure monitoring system118

Top advisory categories

Advisories aren't failures, but they flag work likely needed soon — useful when budgeting.

Most common MOT advisories — 2016 Lexus Ct
# Category % of tests with advisory Tests
1 Tyres 22.8% 3,642
2 Brakes 11.2% 1,791
3 Other defects 5.4% 866
4 Visibility 2.8% 446
5 Suspension 2.6% 417
6 Road wheels 0.7% 106

Failure rate by mileage

Higher-mileage cars tend to fail more — often the most useful guide to real condition.

MOT fail rate by recorded mileage 0-30k 4.9% 30-60k 6.8% 60-90k 9.3% 90-120k 10.5% 120-150k 10.3% 150k+ 8.6%
MOT fail rate by recorded mileage band.
Fail rate by recorded mileage — 2016 Ct
Mileage band Tests Fail rate
0-30k 2,681 4.9%
30-60k 6,947 6.8%
60-90k 3,877 9.3%
90-120k 1,451 10.5%
120-150k 555 10.3%
150k+ 432 8.6%

Failure rate by age

MOT fail rate by vehicle age at test 5 yrs 7.1% 6 yrs 6.8% 7 yrs 6.7% 8 yrs 7.9% 9 yrs 9.4%
How this model-year's MOT fail rate climbs as the cars get older.

Trend over time

Fail rate by dataset year — 2016 Ct
Dataset year Tests Fail rate
2021 3,192 7.1%
2022 3,186 6.8%
2023 3,187 6.7%
2024 3,165 7.9%
2025 3,215 9.4%

What to check before buying a 2016 Ct

On a 2016 Ct, tyres is what the MOT record says goes wrong most — it appeared in 4.4% of tests. Check these areas before you commit.

Repair costs are rough UK ballpark ranges to set expectations, not quotes — actual prices vary widely by car, parts and garage.

Frequently asked questions

How many 2016 Lexus Cts pass their MOT?

92.4% of the 15,945 2016 Lexus Ct MOT tests in this dataset passed — a 7.6% fail rate.

What is the most common MOT failure on a 2016 Lexus Ct?

Tyres, recorded in 4.4% of tests, followed by lighting & signalling (3.4%).

Does the 2016 Ct get worse with mileage?

Its MOT fail rate rises from 4.9% in the 0-30k band to 8.6% in the 150k+ band.

Methodology & source. Based on 15,945 MOT tests. Dataset: DVSA MOT testing data (2021,2022,2023,2024,2025). Data last updated 2026-07-27. Figures reflect MOT-testable defects only — read the methodology for how these are calculated and what they don't measure.

Related data